Transformation of world financial architecture (WFA) is offered to be carried out with use of model of the geostrategy formed within the limits of a triad of institutes «geopolitics-geoeconomy-geonomika». On the basis of sovereign funds and national riches of the countries-participants new WFA it is offered to realize the concept of the national rent and to create new metacurrency. It is given reason, that resistance of transformation it will be possible to expect in spheres of a national competition, stability of development and safety. Transformation threats are resulted, the indicators, allowing to estimate economic safety of these countries are offered.

The article discusses the impact of the global financial and economic crisis on Russian economy, its current state and growth trends. The reasons for absence of any significant positive shifts in switching to the upgrading (innovative) reproduction type are analyzed. It is being justified that the main problem is the existing system of economic relations, its institutional realization that does not incite (or even prevent) enterprisers’ interest in innovation.

As a result of the global financial and economic crisis, social problems have sharpened significantly. They affect the interest of the most population of the country. The efficiency of anti-recessionary measures and their productivity in the social field are analyzed in the article. According to the adjusted estimates of the RF Government, decrease in actual income of the people will continue and only by the end of 2012 a growth by only 3% to 2008 level is projected. The degree of elaboration and scientific justification of the state turnaround policy are getting special significance.

The global financial and economic crisis significantly affected enterprises of the real economy sector. According to some estimates, in 2009 about 40% of unprofitable Russian businesses of this economy sector were bankrupt. An important task for the state management is preventing mass bankrupts and non-payments crisis. Some measures to reduce bankrupt risks for enterprises of the real economy sector have been suggested in order to save business and increase its efficiency.

The article discusses differences and interrelations of strategic and crisis management. Ways for further development of crisis management at the intersection of economics, psychology, physiology, law, management and other disciplines are being proposed. The conclusion is made that crisis management is a new management paradigm. The model “subject to management – mechanic system” gave place to the model “subject to management – living organism”. The new model in the frame of crisis management allows studying subject to management’s adaptation to changes as an attribute feature of any living organism.

The problem of township-forming enterprises’ functioning has acquired strategic importance not only for towns and regions separately, but for Russian Economy in whole. Steady social and economic growth of single-industry towns depends on many factors. The article discusses reasons for crisis situations, business features of township-forming enterprises, opportunities for their growth. The necessity is being justified to define growth points amid crisis as well as in the post-crisis development.