Preview

Strategic decisions and risk management

Advanced search

New tariff regulation for natural monopolies: what should it be?

https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2017-4-5-30-37

Abstract

For the last several years, the Russian Federation has been artificially restraining the growth of tariffs for the services of natural monopolies. A simple decision, which is taken hastily a few years ago as a short-term anti-crisis measure, has every chance of becoming a "solution" for many years to come. The authors attempt to analyze the short-term and long-term effects of the tariff regulation and present the results obtained in the framework of the basic research program of the Higher School of Economics on the impact of tariffs in the energy sector on the main macroeconomic indicators, most often used as arguments in favor of tariff restraint. It is shown that tariffs, including the ones for electricity networks, should cover all efficient costs of regulated companies in full which enables reliable and safe power supply for sustainable and efficient development of industries and wellbeing of the population. The authors present for the first time the results of the estimations of the efficiency of the operational costs of electric networks in Russia obtained on the models developed by the Institute of Pricing and Regulation of Natural Monopolies. The models are based on the data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique, one of the most advanced and most common methods in contemporary tariff setting.

About the Authors

I. A. Dolmatov
Institute of Pricing and Regulation of Natural Monopolies of NRU HSE (National Research University Higher School of Economics)
Russian Federation
Ph.D. in Economics, Director of Institute of Pricing and Regulation of Natural Monopolies of NRU HSE (National Research University Higher School of Economics). Scope of scientific research: tariff setting and investment activities in the natural monopolies and infrastructure sectors; liberalization of natural monopolies in Russia and abroad.


I. YU. Zolotova
Institute of Pricing and Regulation of Natural Monopolies of NRU HSE (National Research University Higher School of Economics)
Russian Federation
Deputy Director of Institute of Pricing and Regulation of Natural Monopolies of NRU HSE (National Research University Higher School of Economics). Scope of scientific research: government system for regulation of natural monopolies, pricing, price forecasting models for electric power industry and infrastructure sectors.


I. V. Maskaev
Institute of Pricing and Regulation of Natural Monopolies of NRU HSE (National Research University Higher School of Economics)
Russian Federation
Senior Research Associate of Institute of Pricing and Regulation of Natural Monopolies of NRU HSE (National Research University Higher School of Economics). Scope of scientific research: tariff regulation of natural monopolies in Russia and abroad, benchmarking, mathematical simulation.


References

1. Годовой отчет за 2015 год. (2016) // rustocks.com. http://www.rustocks.com / put.phtml / MRKH_2015_RUS.pdf.

2. Доклад главы Минэкономразвития России на заседании Правительства РФ о сценарных условиях и основных параметрах прогноза социально-экономического развития Российской Федерации на 2017 год и плановый период 2018–2019 годов (2016) // Министерство экономического развития Российской Федерации. URL: http://economy.gov.ru / minec / press / official / 2016210402? presentationtemplate=m_activityFormMatherial&presentationtemplateid=aabc27004b74dbd4bfa4bf77bb90350d

3. Кривошапко Ю. Брак по расчетам (2017) // Российская газета. 28 февр. URL: https://rg.ru / 2017 / 02 / 28 / glava-fas-igor-artemev-rasskazal-o-tom-pochemu-v-rf-vysokie-tarify.html.

4. Порохова Н., Снитко Д. (2014) Энергетика: О пармезане и тарифах монополий // Ведомости. 26 нояб. URL: http://www.vedomosti.ru / opinion / articles / 2014 / 11 / 26 / o-parmezane-itarifah-monopolij

5. Приказ Минэнерго России от 01.03.2016 № 147 «Об утверждении схемы и программы развития Единой энергетической системы России на 2016–2022 годы» // КонсультантПлюс. URL: http://www.consultant.ru / document / cons_doc_LAW_197351 / .

6. Приказ ФСТ России от 18.03.2015 № 421‑э «Об утверждении Методических указаний по определению базового уровня операционных, подконтрольных расходов территориальных сетевых организаций, необходимых для осуществления регулируемой деятельности, и индекса эффективности операционных, подконтрольных расходов с применением метода сравнения аналогов и внесении изменений в приказы ФСТ России от 17.02.2012 № 98‑э и от 30.03.2012 № 228‑э» // КонсультантПлюс. URL: http://www.consultant.ru / document / cons_doc_LAW_179030 / .

7. Прогноз социально-экономического развития Российской Федерации на 2017 год и на плановый период 2018 и 2019 годов (2016) / Министерство экономического развития Российской Федерации. М.

8. Прогнозы социально-экономического развития Российской Федерации и отдельных секторов экономики (2016) // Министерство экономического развития Российской Федерации. URL: http://economy.gov.ru / minec / activity / sections / macro / prognoz / .

9. Сценарные условия, основные параметры прогноза социально-экономического развития Российской Федерации и предельные уровни цен (тарифов) на услуги компаний инфраструктурного сектора на 2017 год и на плановый период 2018 и 2019 годов (2016) / Министерство экономического развития Российской Федерации. М.

10. Федеральный закон «Об электроэнергетике» от 26.03.2003 № 35‑ФЗ // КонсультантПлюс. URL: http://www.consultant.ru / document / cons_doc_LAW_41502 / .

11. Coelli T., Estache A., Perelman S. et al. (2003) A Primer on Efficiency Measurement for Utilities and Transport Regulators. WBI Development Studies, WorldBank, Washington D. C.

12. Economist Intelligence Unit. URL: http://gfs.eiu.com / Archive.aspx?archiveType=commoditiesoverview.

13. Haney A. B., Pollitt M. G. (2009) Efficiency Analysis of Energy Networks: An International Survey of Regulators. Energy Policy. Vol. 37, № 12. P. 5814–5830.

14. Lovell K. (2006) Frontier Analysis: Recent Advances and Future Challenges. Keynote Address, North American Productivity Workshop / Stern School of Business, New York University. New York.

15. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2017). URL: https://stats.oecd.org / index.aspx?DataSetCode=EO.

16. Short-Term Energy Outlook (2017) // U. S. Energy Information Administration. URL: https://www.eia.gov / outlooks / steo / archives / Mar17.pdf.

17. Short-Term Energy Outlook (2017) // US Energy Information Administration. URL: https://www.eia.gov / outlooks / steo / .

18. The Global Competitiveness Report, 2013–2014 (2013) / World Economic Forum. Geneva.

19. The Global Competitiveness Report, 2016–2017 (2016) / World Economic Forum. Geneva.

20. WEO Update (2017). URL: https://www.imf.org / en / Publications / WEO / Issues / 2016 / 12 / 27 / A-Shifting-Global-Economic-Landscape.

21. World Bank Commodities Price Forecast (2016). URL: http://pubdocs.worldbank.org / en / 764161469470731154 / CMO-2016‑July-forecasts.pdf.

22. World Energy Outlook 2013 / OECD / IEA. Ch. 8: Energy and competitiveness. URL: https://www.iea.org / publications / freepublications / publication / WEO2013.pdf.


Review

For citations:


Dolmatov I.A., Zolotova I.Yu., Maskaev I.V. New tariff regulation for natural monopolies: what should it be? Strategic decisions and risk management. 2017;(4-5):30-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2017-4-5-30-37

Views: 1652


ISSN 2618-947X (Print)
ISSN 2618-9984 (Online)