SELF-REGULATION AS ONE OF THE KEY STRATEGIC ELEMENTS IN THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM IN CRISIS
https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2016-3-70-77
Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine the role of self-regulation as one of the key strategic elements in the reconstruction of the financial system in crisis. Approaches – including analysis of the causes and consequences of the global financial crisis in 2008, the monographic literature on the subject identified challenges and their solutions for implementation of self-Regulation of the financial sector (results of research). Social value – the current situation of the crisis of investor confidence in the financial sector requires substantial organizational restructuring. The confidence of investors in adjustable and adequate operation of the financial sector is key for ensuring long-term economic recovery in conditions of the ongoing financial crisis. Practical application of the results is justified practical necessity of establishing responsibility for regulating and minimizing systemic risk of financial firms, the establishment of the state strategy of generating and maintaining an effective method of state regulation and control, defining key goals of economic policy, and have oversight and control over the development of the system of self-regulation (compliance programs) promoted by the sector. The originality lies in the fact that in the scientific revolution introduced the theoretical conclusions, the modern practice of self-regulation of the financial services sector with strong governmental control.
About the Authors
Y. V. Trencevski
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of legal Sciences, Professorof the Department «Risks Analysis and economic security», Chair in «Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation». Area of interest: corporate compliance from criminal threats.
O. G. Karpovich
Institute of USA and Canada Studies;Comparative Legal Studies Center
Russian Federation
Doctor of Laws, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Institute of USA and Canada Studies, Head of Comparative Legal Studies Center
Russian Federation
Doctor of Laws, Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Institute of USA and Canada Studies, Head of Comparative Legal Studies Center
References
1. Карпович О. Г., Трунцевский Ю. В. (2016) Теория и современные практики комплаенса. Модели противодействия корпоративным угрозам. М.: Юнити-Дана: Закон и право, 2016.
2. Трунцевский Ю. В., Раменская П. Ю. (2013) Корпоративный комплаенс как альтернатива законов, нормативов и правил // Международное публичное и частное право. № 2. С. 39–42.
3. Baer M. H. (2009) Governing Corporate Compliance // Boston College Law Review.Vol. 50, N 4. P. 949–1019.
4. Bernanke B. S. Financial reform to address systemic risk // Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. URL: https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20090310a.htm.
5. Black J. (2001) Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a «Post-Regulatory» World // Current Legal Problems. Vol.54, N 1. P. 103-146.
6. Cross F. B. (2005) Law and Trust // Georgetown Law Review.Vol. 93. P. 1457–1545.
7. Business Regulation and Australia’s Future (1993) / Eds. P. Grabosky, J. Braithwaite.Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology,. 287 p.
8. Gunningham N., Rees J. (1997) Industry Self-Regulation: An Institutional Perspective // Law & Policy.Vol.19, N 4. P. 363–414.
9. Kane E. J. (2009) Extracting Nontransparent Safety Net Subsidies by Strategically Expanding and Contracting a Financial Institution’s Accounting Balance Sheet // Journal of Financial Services Research. Vol. 35. P. 161–168.
10. King M. Speech given to Scottish Business Organisations in Edinburgh20 October 2009 // Bank of England. URL: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/archive/Documents/historicpubs/speeches/2009/speech406.pdf.
11. Koebel J. T. (2010) Trust and the Investment Adviser Industry: Congress’ Failure to Realize FINRA's Potential to Restore Investor Confidence // Seton Hall Legislative Journal. Vol. 35, N 1. P. 121–124.
12. McKendall M., DeMarr B., Jones-Rikkers C. (2002) Ethical Compliance Programs and Corporate Illegality: Testing the Assumptions of the Corporate Sentencing Guidelines // Journal of Business Ethics Vol. 37, N 4. P. 367–383.
13. Omarova S. T. (2010) Rethinking the Future of Self-Regulation in the Financial Industry // Brooklyn Journal of International Law. Vol. 35, N 3. P. 665–707.
14. Selznick Ph. The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. Berkeley; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1992. 550 p.
15. Short J. L., Toffel M. W. (2010) Making Self-Regulation More Than Merely Symbolic: The Critical Role of the Legal Environment // Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 55. P. 361–396.
16. Stern G. H., Feldman R. J. (2004) Too Big To Fail. The Hazards of Bank Bailouts. Washington: Brookings Institution Press. 230 p.
17. Tenbrunsel A. E., Messick D. M. (1999) Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation // Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 44. P. 684–707.
18. Whitely P. F. (2000) Economic Growth and Social Capital // Political Studies.Vol. 48, N 3.P. 443–466.
19. Wilmarth Jr. A. E. (2010) Reforming Financial Regulation to Address the Too-Big-To-Fail Problem // Brooklyn Journal of International Law. Vol. 35.P. 707–783.
20. Wilmarth Jr. A. E. (2009) The Dark Side of Universal Banking: Financial Conglomerates and the Origins of the Subprime Crisis // Connecticut Law Review. Vol. 41, N 3. P. 966–1051.
Review
For citations:
Trencevski Y.V., Karpovich O.G. SELF-REGULATION AS ONE OF THE KEY STRATEGIC ELEMENTS IN THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM IN CRISIS. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2016;(3):70-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2016-3-70-77
Views:
1974
Email this article 