Barriers to Workforce Strategy Development in the Automotive Industry: An Empirical Analysis of the Indian Passenger Vehicle Sector Using ISM and MICMAC
https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2026-1-35-46
Abstract
The automotive industry in India is undergoing a rapid digital transformation, necessitating a skilled workforce proficient in emerging technologies. However, multiple barriers impede the effective adoption of such a workforce. This study aims to analyze the interrelationships and hierarchical structure of these barriers within the Indian passenger vehicle sector. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted between April 2024 and July 2025 with senior professionals from leading automotive companies and academicians with established publications in the field (ABDC A- or B-ranked journals). Of the 40 potential respondents approached via email and LinkedIn, 10 provided written consent and participated in the interviews. The responses were transcribed and subjected to thematic analysis, which identified ten key barriers influencing skilled workforce adoption in the era of automotive digital transformation. Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) was used to establish the hierarchical structure of these barriers, while MICMAC (Matrice d’Impacts Croisés-Multiplication Appliquée à un Classement) analysis was employed to classify them according to their driving and dependence power. The root causes appear to include poor training infrastructure, shortcomings in industry-academia collaboration, and policy inefficiencies. These root causes strongly influence other dependent barriers, such as the limited availability of digital skill sets, the high cost of upskilling, and low workforce adaptability due to organizational resistance to change. This structured understanding provides strategic insights for policymakers, industry leaders, and educators seeking to design targeted interventions to strengthen the digital workforce ecosystem in India’s passenger vehicle sector.
About the Authors
A. ThakranRussian Federation
Research Fellow, Department of Physics, National Taiwan University (Taipei, Taiwan); Research Center for Applied Sciences, Academia Sinica (Taipei, Taiwan). ORCID: 0000-0003-1250-2166.
R. S. Rathore
Russian Federation
PhD, Senior Lecturer, Associate Professor, and Program Director for the MSc in Computing and IT, School of Technologies, Cardiff Metropolitan University (Cardiff, United Kingdom). ORCID: 0000-0003-4571-1888.
Research interests: IoT security, cyber-physical system security, drone networking, in-vehicle communication.
N. Sanghi
Russian Federation
Сo-founder, CTO, and Chief Data Scientist of Paybooks, a SaaS HR and payroll platform for the Indian market; angel investor in SaaS software and AI-driven automation across India, the United States, and Singapore; MBA, Indian Institute of Management (Ahmedabad, India), Bachelor of Technology in Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Kanpur, India).
V. Maheshwari
Russian Federation
School of Information Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (Vellore, India). Scopus ID: 57218144235.
Research interests: blockchain vulnerabilities, software testing, software security, object-oriented analysis.
S. L. Sahdev
Russian Federation
PhD, Associate Professor and Deputy Director, Alliance University (Karnataka, India); Amity International Business School, Amity University (Noida, India). ORCID: 0000-0001-5141-5538.
Research interests: open innovation, fintech, blockchain, conversational AI, international business.
References
1. Bajpai H. (2019). The Future of Work in the Automotive Sector in India. CIS India. https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/future-of-work-in-automotive-sector.pdf/view.
2. Debnath B., Singh R.K., Nayak M. (2023). An Integrated Best–Worst Method and Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach for Analyzing Barriers in Circular Economy Adoption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 391: 136337.
3. Faisal S., Attfield S., Blandford A. (2009). A Classification of Sensemaking Representations. In: CHI. Workshop on Sensemaking. http://web4.cs.ucl.ac.uk/uclic/annb/docs/SFchi09preprint.pdf.
4. Fauzdar C. (2022). MICMAC Analysis of Industry 4.0 in Indian Automobile Industry. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 81(7): 670-677.
5. Horváth D., Szabó L. (2019). Driving Forces and Barriers of Industry 4.0: Multinational Companies’ Executives’ Perspectives. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 146: 346-360.
6. Kamble S., Gunasekaran A., Gawankar S. (2018a). Barriers and Challenges for Implementing Industry 4.0 in Indian Manufacturing Organizations: A Framework Analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 126: 111-121.
7. Kamble S.S., Gunasekaran A., Gawankar S.A. (2018b). Sustainable Industry 4.0 Framework: A Systematic Literature Review Identifying the Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117: 408-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009.
8. Rawat P., Yashpal, Purohit J.K. (2024). Evaluating and Prioritizing the Barriers of Industry 4.0 Implementation in Indian SMEs: An ISM Approach. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India), Series C, 105(3): 543-560.
9. Luthra S., Mangla S.K. (2018). Evaluating Challenges to Industry 4.0 Initiatives for Supply Chain Sustainability in Emerging Economies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117: 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.018
10. Human Resource and Skill Requirements in the Automotive Sector (2019). Skill India. https://skillsip.nsdcindia.org/knowledge-products/human-resource-and-skill-requirements-automotive-sector-2026.
11. Ojha R.S., Kumar A., Kumar V., Raja A.R., Singh S. (2024). Industry 4.0 Implementation Barriers in Automotive Manufacturing Industry: Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach. Concurrent Engineering, 32(1-4): 1063293X241287687.
12. Ruben R.B., Rajendran C., Ram R.S., Kouki F., Alshahrani H.M., Assiri M. (2023). Analysis of Barriers Affecting Industry 4.0 Implementation—An ISM Methodology and MICMAC Approach. Heliyon, 9(12): e22506.
13. Ruslin R. (2022). Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on Qualitative Research. Journal of Research Methodology and Evaluation, 12(1): 222-229.
14. Sharma V., Paliwal M.K. (2026). Driving Industrial Transformation: Exploring the Adoption, Impact, and Strategic Frameworks for Industry 4.0 Technologies in Indian Manufacturing Sectors. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 39(3): 468-488.
15. Singh P.P., Kaur S. (2025). Digital Transformation in Indian Automobile Industry. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6(6): 9915-9922.
16. Warfield J. N. (1973). Binary Relations and Their Applications to the Structural Modeling of Large Systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3(2): 133-140.
Review
For citations:
Thakran A., Rathore R.S., Sanghi N., Maheshwari V., Sahdev S.L. Barriers to Workforce Strategy Development in the Automotive Industry: An Empirical Analysis of the Indian Passenger Vehicle Sector Using ISM and MICMAC. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2026;17(1):35-46. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2026-1-35-46


































