IMPLEMENTING “SUSTAINABILITY-BY-DESIGN” APPROACH IN ORGANIZATIONS BY USING AN EXTENDED RISK INDICATORS SYSTEM FOR MAKING STRATEGIC DECISIONS
https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-925
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to identify possible approaches to the development of the “sustainability-by-design” process, which consists in synchronizing the organization's strategy with the trends of sustainable development. For this purpose, a process of “sustainability-by-design” is proposed on the basis of the “safety-by-design” process applied in practice. As a key link in the process, it is proposed to use a system of sustainability indicators, supplemented by indicators of risk and resilience. To strengthen the adaptive capacity of companies in the field of sustainable development, the process of building “sustainability-by-design” is complemented by the inclusion of democratic procedures through structured stakeholder participation. As a result, the proposed process combines a rigid structure of values and goals with a “soft setup” in the form of democratic procedures. This will allow companies not only to reduce the uncertainties inherent to the pacing problem, but also to create an environment for the promotion of the most effective alternatives to the development of companies in the field of sustainability.
About the Author
L. A. SachenkoRussian Federation
Candidate of economic sciences, CEO of “Risk-profile” LLC. Research interests: insurance, risk management, sustainable development.
References
1. Grigoreva S.V. (2013). Otsenka strategicheskoy ustoychivosti v razvitii predpriyatiya [Assessment of strategic sustainability in enterprise development]. Voprosy ekonomiki i prava [Issues of Economics and Law], 33-37, 3.
2. Kuznetsova M.O. (2020). Strategicheskaya ustoychivost’ promyshlennykh kompaniy: podkhody k ponimaniyu i analiz riskov [Strategic sustainability of industrial companies: Аpproaches to understanding and risk analysis]. Strategicheskie resheniya i risk-menedzhment [Strategic Decisions and Risk Management], 11(2), 196-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2020-2-196-205.
3. Samosudov M.V. (2006). Korporativnoe upravlenie: Teoriya korporativnogo vzaimodeystviya [Corporate governance: Theory of corporate engagement]. Moscow, Russian Foreign Trade Academy of the Ministry for the Economic Development of the Russian Federation.
4. Sachenko L.A. (2020). Perspektivy razvitiya risk-menedzhmenta organizatsiy s tochki zreniya obshchey teorii sistem [Organizational risk-management perspectives from the general systems theory point of view]. Problemy analiza riska [Issues of Risk Analysis], 17(4), 54-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2020-17-4-54-63.
5. Afgan N.Y., Carvalho M.G., Hovanov N.V. (2000). Energy system assessment with sustainability indicators. Energy Policy, 28, 603-612.
6. Arena M., Azzone G. (2010). Process based approach to select key sustainability indicators for steel companies. Ironmaking and Steelmaking. Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining, 37(6), 437-444.
7. Bruneau M., Chang S.E., Eguchi R.T., Lee G.C., O’Rourke T.D., Reihorn A.M., Shinozuka M., Tierney K., Wallace W.A., Winterfeldt D. von (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19, 733-752.
8. Dos Santos F.T., Partidário M.R. (2011). SPARK: Strategic planning approach for resilience keeping. European Planning Studies. Taylor & Francis Journals, 19(8), 1517-1536.
9. Downes L. (2009). The laws of disruption: Harnessing the new forces that govern life and business in the digital age. Basic Books.
10. Faber M.H. (2018). On sustainability and resilience of engineered systems. In: Gardioni P. (еd.). Routledge handbook on sustainable and resilient infrastructure. Ch. 3. London, Routledge.
11. Ganin A.A., Massaro E., Gutfraind A., Steen N., Keisler J.M., Kott A., Mangoubi R., Linkov I. (2016). Operational resilience: Concepts, design and analysis. Scientific Reports, 6, 19540. DOI: 10.1038/srep19540.
12. Gillespie-Marthaler L., Nelson K., Baroud H., Abkowitz M. (2019). Selecting indicators for accessing community sustainable resilience. Risk Analysis, 11(39), 2479-2498.
13. Hardi P., Zdan T. (1997). Assessing sustainable development: Principles in practice. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Internation Institute for Sustainablie Development.
14. Lengnick-Hall C.A., Beck T.E., Lengnick-Hall M.L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 243-255.
15. Linkov I., Trump B.D., Hynes W. (2019). Resilience-based strategies and policies to address systemic risks. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, SG/NAEC (2019)5.
16. Linkov I., Trump B.D. (2019). The science and practice of resilience. Cham, Springer.
17. Marchant G.E., Allenby B.R., Herkert J.R. (2011). The growing gap between emerging technologies and legal-ethical oversight: The pacing problem. Dordrecht, Germany, Springer.
18. Mohamed E.S., Saleh A.M., Belal A.A. (2014). Sustainability indicators for agricultural land use based on GIS spatial modeling in North of Sinai-Egypt. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, 17.
19. Nielsen L., Faber M.H. (2019). Impacts of sustainability and resilience research on risk governance, management and education. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure. DOI: 10.1080/23789689.2019.1611056.
20. Qien K., Massaiu S., Timmannsvik R.K. (2012). Guideline for implementing the REWI method. Trondheim, Norway: SINTEF. Report A22026.
21. Reid J., Rout M. (2020). Developing sustainability indicators - The need for radical transparency. Ecological Indicators, 110, 105941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105941.
22. Rose A., Krausmann E. (2013). An economic framework for the development of a resilience index for business recovery. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 5, 73-83.
23. Sachenko L. (2020). Organizational resilience. Cost optimization approaches. The 8th International Conference on Computing for Physics and Technology (CPT2020), Conference Proceedings, 138-143.
24. Sikula N.R., Mancillas J.W., Linkov I., McDonagh J.A. (2015). Risk management is not enough: A conceptual model for resilience and adaptation-based vulnerability assessments. Environment Systems and Decision, 35, 219-228.
25. Stewart R., Fantke P., Bjørn A., Owsianiak M., Molin C., Zwicky Hauschild M., Laurent A. (2018). Life cycle assessment in corporate sustainability reporting: Global, regional, sectoral, and company-level trends. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1751-1764.
26. Trump B.D., Keislerb J.M., Galaitsia S.E., PalmaOliveira J.M., Linkov I. (2020). Safety-by-design as a governance problem. Nano Today, 35, 100989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100989.
27. Wu J., Wu T. (2012). Sustainability indicators and indices. In: Handbook of sustainable management. London, Imperial College Press.
28. Yatsalo B., Sullivan T., Didenko V., Gritsyuk S., Mirzeabasov O., Pichugina I., Linkov I. (2005). Environmental risk management with the use of multi-criteria spatial decision support system DECERNS. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 16(4), 175-198.
Review
For citations:
Sachenko L.A. IMPLEMENTING “SUSTAINABILITY-BY-DESIGN” APPROACH IN ORGANIZATIONS BY USING AN EXTENDED RISK INDICATORS SYSTEM FOR MAKING STRATEGIC DECISIONS. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2020;11(4):402-411. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-925