DRIVERS FOR THE ADOPTION OF DIGITAL PLATFORMS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF RUSSIAN SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES
https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-917
Abstract
Digitalization is one of the key factors in increasing competitiveness, which signifi cantly expands the capabilities of enterprises, transforming the business models of companies and signifi cantly changing the process of creating value for the consumer. One of the components of the digital economy that can become a driver for the development of entire industries are digital platforms, which in modern conditions may bring signifi cant benefi ts both for large enterprises, and as well as for small and medium-sized enterprises. Despite the high importance of using digital platforms, the use of digital platforms among small and medium-sized businesses is not widespread in Russia. This article aims to identify the factors that contribute to the adoption of digital platforms among small and medium enterprises.
About the Authors
G. G. Nalbandyan
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Senior lecturer, Department of management and innovation, faculty ”Higher school of management”, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. Research interests: entrepreneurship, digital economy, foreign economic activity of industrial companies.
Т. V. Khovalova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Senior lecturer of the Department of management and innovation, faculty ”Higher school of management”, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. Research interests: digital economy, innovation in manufacturing companies.
References
1. Schislyaeva E.R., Barykin S.E., Kovalenko E.A., Burova A.Yu. (2020). Razvitie konkurentnogo preimushchestva logisticheskoy platformy na osnove tsifrovizatsii khabov [Digitalization of logistics hubs as a competitive advantage]. Strategicheskie resheniya i risk-menedzhment [Strategic Decisions and Risk Management], 11(1), 48-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2020-1-48-55.
2. TarasovI.V.(2018). Tekhnologiiindustrii4.0: vliyanienapovyshenie proizvoditel’nosti promyshlennykh kompaniy [Industry 4.0: Technologies and their impact on productivity of industrial companies]. Strategicheskie resheniya i risk-menedzhment [Strategic Decisions and Risk Management], 2(107), 62-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2018-2-62-69.
3. Trachuk A.V., Linder N.V. (2015). Transformatsiya biznes-modeley elektronnogo biznesa v usloviyakh nestabil’noy vneshney sredy [Transformation of business models of electronic business in conditions of unstable external environment]. Strategicheskie resheniya i risk-menedzhment [Strategic Decisions and Risk Management], 2(89), 58-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2015-2-58-71.
4. Trachuk A.V., Linder N.V. (2018). Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya: kak vliyaet Internet veshchey na vzaimodeystvie promyshlennykh kompaniy s partnerami? [Fourth industrial revolution: How the internet of things infl uenceson industrial business relationships?]. Strategicheskie resheniya i risk-menedzhment [Strategic Decisions and Risk Management], 3(108), 16-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2018-3-16-29.
5. Khasanov A.R. (2018). Vliyanie prediktivnoy analitiki na deyatel’nost’ kompaniy [Impact of predictive analytics on the activities of companies]. Strategicheskie resheniya i risk-menedzhmen [Strategic Decisions and Risk Management], 3(108), 108-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2018-3-108-113.
6. Boudreau K.J. (2012). Let a thousand fl owers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organization Science, 23(5), 1409-1427.
7. Eisenmann T.R., Parker G., Van Alstyne M.W. (2008). Opening platforms: How, when and why? Harvard Business School, August, 131-162.
8. Eisenmann T., Parker G., Van Alstyne M. (2011). Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1270-1285.
9. Fine C.H. (2000). Clockspeed-based strategies for supply chain design 1. Production and Operations Management, 9(3), 213-221.
10. Ghazawneh A., Henfridsson O. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: Тhe boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173-192.
11. Markovich S., Moenius J. (2009). Winning while losing: Competition dynamics in the presence of indirect network effects. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(3), 346-357.
12. Parker G.G., Van Alstyne M.W. (2005). Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Science, 51(10), 1494-1504.
13. Rysman M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 125-143.
Review
For citations:
Nalbandyan G.G., Khovalova Т.V. DRIVERS FOR THE ADOPTION OF DIGITAL PLATFORMS: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF RUSSIAN SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2020;11(4):346-353. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-917
Views:
3866
Email this article 