Measuring the effectiveness of mergers and acquisitions: features of the application of the DEA method
https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2017-6-58-65
Abstract
With every year, the application of merges and acquisitions strategy becomes more and more topical for Russian companies. One of the most topical issues is carrying out the analysis of efficiency of M&A transactions that is also confirmed by increasing the number of works in the field of assessment of efficiency of M&A transactions of companies.
In this article, the main methods of assessment of efficiency of M&A transactions, and also possibility of use of the DEA method in determining efficiency of transactions of the oil and gas companies are considered for example. The comparative analysis of application of traditional methods and the DEA method using example of an assessment of efficiency of acquisition of JSC Rosneft is carried out. Results of the analysis showed that it is necessary to carry out a complex assessment of productivity of the M&A transaction, using some methods and assessment approaches, since the DEA method not always works in a section of an assessment of efficiency before and after the transaction. So, according to the given calculations, the effect of acquisition in the first year after acquisition was positive (0,001%), but by 2014 became 0,9%. Profitability of assets as started decreasing, and two years later the total change became 5%. Thus profitability of the capital increased in the first year by 26% however in a year this value decreased. At the same time, this method is applicable for an express choice of the companies purposes from a large number of the companies.
The sequence of steps is developed for DEA method application in an assessment of efficiency of carrying out transactions on merges and acquisitions, and also a technique of definition of DMU for an assessment of efficiency of one transaction within DEA method use that gives to research the high practical importance. Recommendations about express selection of the companies purposes for carrying out the transaction of M&A are made.
About the Author
S. N. Virabyan
OJSC “Severneftegazprom”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
economist at OJSC “Severneftegazprom”. Research interests: strategic management, assessment of efficiency and performance, nonparametric methods of analysis
References
1. Карлик А. Е., Кармазинова Я. Ф., Трачук А. В. (1999) Региональное регулирование деятельности предприятий субъектов естественных монополий. СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУЭФ. 50 с.
2. Колмаков В. В., Коокуева В. В., Чапкина Е. Г. и др. (2013) Теория и практика управления финансовой деятельностью / Под ред. А. Г. Поляковой; МЭСИ. М.: Ист Консалтинг. 196 с.
3. Линдер Н. В. (2014) Стратегии диверсифицированного роста и определение оптимальных границ крупных промышленных бизнес-групп // Эффективное Антикризисное Управление. №1. С. 90–99.
4. Мазорчук М. С., Добряк В. С., Емельянов П. С. (2015) Анализ практического применения метода «охвата данных» для оценки эффективности образовательного процесса // Открытые информационные и компьютерные интегрированные технологии. № 69. С. 234–246.
5. Трачук А. В. (2017) Акционерное общество «Гознак»: пути развития // Деньги и кредит. № 1. С. 61–64.
6. Трачук А. В. (2009) Методы стимулирования инвестиций в инфраструктурные проекты (на примере электроэнергетики) // Проблемы современной экономики. № 4. С. 350–353.
7. Трачук А. В. (2011) Реформирование естественных монополий: цели, результаты и направления развития. М.: Экономика. 319 с.
8. Трачук А. В., Линдер Н. В. (2016а) Влияние ограничений ликвидности на вложения промышленных компаний в исследования и разработки и результативность инновационной деятельности // Эффективное Антикризисное Управление. №1. С. 80–89.
9. Трачук А. В., Линдер Н. В. (2017) Инновации и производительность российских промышленных компаний // Инновации. № 4 (222). С. 53–65.
10. Трачук А. В., Линдер Н. В. (2016б) Методика многофакторной оценки инновационной активности холдингов в промышленности // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. Т. 198. С. 298–308.
11. Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units // European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 2, № 6. P. 429–444.
12. Cidália L. P., Pérez J. P. (2013) El uso de la metodología DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) para la evaluación del impacto de las TIC en la productividad del sector hotelero //Varia. Vol.1. P. 1–13.
13. Cook W. D., Seiford L. M. (2009) Data envelopment analysis (DEA) – Thirty years on // European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 192, № 1. P. 1–17.
14. Dekker D., Post T. A. (2001) Quasi concave DEA model with an application for bank branch performance evaluation // European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 132, № 2. P. 296–311.
15. Doyle P. (2011) Value-Based Marketing. Chichester: Wiley.
16. Ghulam M. C., Syed Z., Shujahat H. (2016) Impact of Mergers & Acquisitions upon Banking Efficiency in Pakistan: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach, Journal of Business Studies Quarterly. Vol. 8, № 1. P. 46–59.
17. Junior P., Junior P., Pamplona E. et al. (2013) Mergers and Acquisitions: An Efficiency Evaluation // Applied Mathematics.
18. Vol. 4, № 11. P. 1583–1589.
19. Kohers T., Huang M.‑H., Kohers N. (2000) Market Perception of Efficiency in Bank Holding Company Mergers: the Roles of the DEA and SFA Models in Capturing MergerPotential // Review of Financial Economics. Vol. 9, № 2. P. 101–120.
20. Kumar S. (2009) Post-Merger Corporate Performance: An Indian Perspective. Management Research. Vol. 32, № 2. P. 145–157.
21. Rahman M., Lambkin M., Hussain D. (2016) Value creation and appropriation following M&A: A data envelopment analysis // Journal of Business Research. Vol. 69. P. 5628–5635.
22. Weiguo X., Ming L. (2008) Empirical research of M&A impact on Chinese and American commercial banks’ efficiency based on DEA method // Management Science and Engineering. Vol.2, № 1. P. 38–47.
Review
For citations:
Virabyan S.N. Measuring the effectiveness of mergers and acquisitions: features of the application of the DEA method. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2017;(6):58-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2017-6-58-65
Views:
3643
Email this article 