Stakeholder approach in benchmark of corporate risk management
https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2017-4-5-16-29
Abstract
Decision-making regarding cooperation with a particular company requires a sufficiently in-depth analysis of the attractiveness and prospects of such cooperation. Standard methods of analysis, such as analysis of economic activity, investment attractiveness and efficiency of investment projects, undoubtedly remain the main ones in the organization of interaction, but due to the fact that most companies deviate from the normative values of activity and still remain attractive enough for cooperation, the analysis of the efficiency of intrafirms corporate processes is becoming increasingly popular. The huge variety of risk management methods, along with the inability to obtain reliable information about the methods used within the firm, force stakeholders to pay attention to indirect signals of effectiveness evaluation. In the course of the research, it was suggested that stakeholders have their own judgment about the effectiveness of intracorporate management processes that are different from common valuation techniques and conducted their own research. Based on the survey data conducted with representatives of the top management of various sectors of the economy, a list of relevant criteria for the effectiveness of intra-corporate risk management was obtained. The use of statistical methods of analysis and methods of scientific knowledge allowed to develop a mathematical methodology for evaluating these criteria, and empirical data of 88 Russian companies in the non-financial sector were used as a basis for calculating control points for application in practice. The theoretical significance is the identification of points of control of the effectiveness of risk management from the perspective of stakeholders; practical relevance reflects the toolkit for comparing the company with the best practices.
About the Author
V. M. MakarovaRussian Federation
Ph.D. in Economics, Assistant Professor of the Finance Department of National Research University Higher School of Economics. Scope of scientific research: corporate risk management, corporate management, initial public offering, external funding for business development.
References
1. Бадалова А. Г., Пантелеев П. А. (2011) Функциональная схема системы стратегического управления риском предприятия авиационно-промышленного комплекса на основе стоимостного подхода // Вестник ЮРГТУ (НПИ). № 5. С. 21–29.
2. Князев Е. А., Евдокимова Я. Ш. (2006) Бенчмаркинг для вузов: Учеб.-метод. пос. М.: Университетская книга, Логос. 208 с.
3. Косорукова И. В. (2013) Стоимостно-ориентированный подход к анализу конкурентоспособности бизнеса // Современная конкуренция. № 2. С. 74–84.
4. Макарова В. А. (2015) Эффективность риск-менеджмента: оценка и ее влияние на инвестиционную привлекательность бизнеса // Управление финансовыми рисками. № 4. С. 270–287.
5. Макарова В. А., Корниенко О. Ю. (2016) Актуальные вопросы оценки эффективности корпоративного риск-менеджмента: В 2 ч. / Под ред. В. А. Макаровой. СПб.: Изд-во Политехн. ун-та. Ч. 2: Выбор ключевых показателей и минимизация последствий шорт-термизма. 206 с.
6. Скобелева И. П., Санжиева Т. В. (2013) Адаптация риск-менеджмента к современным концепциям стратегического управления компанией // Современные аспекты экономики. № 4 (188). СПб.: Инфо-да. С. 50–55.
7. Basova M., Michelsky A. (2012) Risk Management KPIs: Efficiency Tool or Formality? // Enterprise Risk Management Symposium. URL: http://www.ermsymposium.org/2011/index.php.
8. Damodaran A. (2007) Return on Capital (ROC), Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Return on Equity (ROE): Measurement and Implications. NewYork.
9. Hilson D., Murray-Webster R. (2005). Understanding and Managing Risk Attitude. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
10. Jaspal S. (2011) Metrics to Measure Risk Management Strategy Effectiveness // Sonia Jaspal’s Risk Board. URL: https://soniajaspal.wordpress.com/2011/07/28/metrics-to-measure-risk-management-strategy-effectiveness/.
11. Mitran D. (2013). Improving Access of SMEs to the Public Procurement Markets // Internal Auditing and Risk Management / Athenaeum University of Bucharest. Vol. 2. P. 244–251.
12. Segal S. (2011). Corporate Value of Enterprise Risk Management: The Next Step in Business Management. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley. 427 p.
13. Talbot J., Jakeman M. (2012) How to Performance Benchmark Your Risk Management: A practical guide to help you tell if your risk management is effective. New York: CreateSpace.52 p.
Review
For citations:
Makarova V.M. Stakeholder approach in benchmark of corporate risk management. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2017;(4-5):16-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2017-4-5-16-29