Improvement of motivation environment in Russian innovation-oriented companies
https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2017-1-2-74-78
Abstract
The article represents main terms of motivation environment concept, elaborated by the author, as an instrument for personnel involvement growth in a company’s innovation process. Analysis of motivation environment components in Russian high-tech innovation-oriented companies “AO «NPO “Krypten»” and “OOO «Verilion»” is held, and problem aspects, which prevent to the companies' effective activity are defined. Practical instruments and recommendations for their solution are offered. Positive influence of motivation environment in a process of commercial organisations' strategic development is proved.
About the Author
A. V. SAYAPIN
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, LLC “Planeta Nedvizhimost”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate student of the Department of “Strategic and Anti-Crisis Management” of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Director General of LLC “Planeta Nedvizhimost”.
Area of expertise: strategic management, human resources management, innovation management
References
1. Трачук А.В. (2013) Формирование инновационной стратегии компании // Управленческие науки. № 3 (8). С. 16-25.
2. АО «Криптен» ( [б.г.]) // Вся реклама. URL: http://reklama-all.ru / agency / kripten-12530 / .
3. АО «НПО «Криптен»» ( [б.г.]). URL: http://www.krypten.ru / about.php.
4. Вишнякова М. (2016) KPI (ключевые показатели эффективности). Каквнедрить систему KPI в компании // Генеральный директор. URL: http://gd.ru / articles / 3584‑kpi.
5. «Криптен» ( [б.г.]) // Мир голографии. URL: http://www.holography-journal.com / криптен / .
6. Лири Д. (2004) ERP системы. Современное планирование и управление ресурсами предприятия. М.: Вершина. 272 с.
7. ООО «Верилион» ( [б.г.]) // Каталог фирм. URL: http://moscow.cataloxy.ru / firms / www.verilion.ru.htm.
8. Саяпин А. В. (2016) Совершенствование инновационного процесса предприятия путем формирования мотивирующей среды // Вестник РУДН. Серия Экономика. № 4. С. 90–98.
9. Хеллевиг Й. (2012) Вовлеченность персонала в России. Как построить корпоративную культуру, основанную на вовлеченности персонала, клиентоориентированности и инновациях. RussiaAdvisoryGroupOy, Helsinki. URL: http://www.awaragroup.com / upload / pdf / Employee_Engagement_in_Russia_Rus.pdf.
10. Amabile T ., Mueller J. (2008) Studying creativity, its processes, and its antecedents: an exploration of the componential theory of creativity. Handbook of organizational creativity. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum. P. 33–64.
11. Asheim B., Coenen L ., Vang J. (2007) Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy // Environment and planning C-government and policy. Vol. 25, № 5. P. 655–670.
12. Bathelt H ., Malmberg A ., Maskell P . (2004) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation // Progress in Human Geography, № 28 (1). P. 31–56.
13. Baumruk R . (2004) The missing link: the role of employee engagement in business success // Workspan. Vol. 47. P. 48–52.
14. Dul J., Ceylon C ., Jaspers F . (2011) Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment // Human resources management. Vol. 50, N 6. P. 357–372.
15. Floysand A ., Jakobsen S.‑E. (2011) The complexity of innovation: a relational turn // Progress inH uman Geography. Vol. 35, N 3. P. 328–344.
16. Hearing D ., Phillips J. (2005) Innovation Roles: The People You Need for Successful Innovation // WhitePaper. NetCentricsCorporation. Nov.
17. Hekkert M., Negro S. (2009) Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims // Technological forecasting and social change. Vol. 74, № 4. P. 584–594.
18. Kassa A ., Vadi M. (2008) How does culture contribute to innovation? Evidence from European countries / University of Tartu, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration. Tartu. P. 3–30.
19. March-Chorda I ., Mosser J. ( [s.a.]) How organizational culture affects innovation in large sized ICT firms: a pilot study. URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk / fac / soc / wbs / conf / olkc / archive / olkc6 / papers / id_268.pdf.
20. Schaufeli W., Salanova M. (2007) Work engagement: An emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations // Managing Social and Ethical Issues in Organizations. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers. P. 135–177.
21. Verilion ( [б.г.]). URL: http://www.verilion.ru.
22. Voelpel S., Leibold M., Streb C . (2005) The innovation meme: managing innovation replicators for organizational fitness // Journal of Change Management. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 57–69.
Review
For citations:
SAYAPIN A.V. Improvement of motivation environment in Russian innovation-oriented companies. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2017;(1-2):74-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2017-1-2-74-78
Views:
1649
Email this article 