Differentiating Challenges, Risks, and Threats in Strategic Management: A Cognitive Bias Perspective

This article presents selected findings of an ontological analysis and examines the problems associated with the conceptual triad of challenges, risks, and threats. These problems arise both from the external environment and from the human factor. The triad affects the safety and efficiency of professional activity at the microeconomic level, particularly in research and design organizations involved in restoration projects for immovable cultural heritage properties. A literature review of sources addressing the problem under study is provided. The aim of the study is formulated as the search for ways to prevent the influence of this triad on the efficiency of the work performed, and the tasks required to achieve this aim are outlined. The study focuses on the assessment of comprehensive damage and indirect losses, as well as on approaches to measuring the effects produced by the triad. The range of methods and tools used in the study is specified. Several interim original results are obtained that identify the mechanism through which the triad contributes to error formation; the conceptual framework is refined, and a classification of challenges, risks, and threats representing real hazards is proposed. The triad may cause significant damage to an economic entity, impair its market activity, and damage its business reputation and brand value or, conversely, become a window of opportunity. The article presents a case involving the identification and correction of an error in the working documentation of a restoration project for an immovable cultural heritage property of regional significance after the documentation had passed expert review. Promising areas for further research are outlined, including a systematic study of triad formation and the use of threat assessment approaches in strategizing and planning systems. The results are discussed, and two interim conclusions are drawn.

1. Ariely D. (2019). Predictably Irrationality: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. Moscow, Alpina Publisher. (In Russ.)

2. Bobrova L.A. (2021). Cognitive Biases. Social Sciences and Humanities. Series 3: Philosophy, 2: 69-79. DOI: 10.31249/rphil/2021.0204. (In Russ.)

3. Bogatyrev I.S., Tsatsulin A.N. (2024). Once Again on the Problems of Preserving Immovable Cultural Heritage from the Standpoint of Collective and Individual Consumer Perception. Management Consulting, 1: 174-193. (In Russ.)

4. Kalashnikova E.M. (2015). Philosophy of Risk as an Urgent Problem of Interdisciplinary Knowledge. Bulletin of Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University, Series 3: Humanities and Social Sciences, 1: 11-18. (In Russ.)

5. Kahneman D., Tversky A. (2016). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Mistakes. In: Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Moscow, AST. (In Russ.)

6. Kornienko A. A. (2018). On the Problem of Searching for a Universal Risk Measurement in the Culture of a Society of Hazards and Disasters. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Series: Cultural Studies and Art Criticism, 31: 74-80. (In Russ.)

7. Martynova A.G. (2019). Vyborg Works by Finnish Artists Bruno Tuukkanen, Lauri Valcke, Topi Wikstedt, and Juho Rissanen. A Unique Fresco by B. Tuukkanen in Need of Preservation. Modern Scientific Research and Development, 5(34): 68-93. (In Russ.)

8. Mikeshina L.A. (2002). Philosophy of Knowledge. Polemical Chapters. Moscow, Progress - Tradition. (In Russ.)

9. Mysko A.S. (2014). Architecture of Vyborg in the Art Nouveau Era. St. Petersburg, Center for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage. (In Russ.)

10. Nikolaeva N.A. (2015). Northern Art Nouveau in Vyborg. St. Petersburg, Center for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage. (In Russ.)

11. Filippov D.L. (2016). Selecting Methods and Strategies for Countering Threats in the Development of a Physical Protection System Concept. Problems of Risk Analysis, 13(2): 60-65. (In Russ.)

12. Tsatsulin A.N., Bykov A.I. (2023). Analysis of Economic Activities of Enterprises in the Real Sector of the Economy and Financial Organizations. St. Petersburg, Asterion. (In Russ.)

13. Shcherbatykh Yu.V. (2012). Psychology of Stress and Methods of Correction. St. Petersburg, Piter. (In Russ.)

14. Badiou A. (2007). Being and Event. London, New York, Continuum.

15. Böök N., Immonen K. (eds.). (2020). Uno Ullberg - Viipurin arkkitehti. Uno Ullbergseura, Arkkitehtuurimuseo.

16. Kahneman D., Sibony O., Sunstein C.R. (2021). Noise. A Flaw in Human Judgment. William Collins.