Cash Holdings Management, Organizational Capital, and Stock Liquidity: The Precautionary Motive for Risk Mitigation
https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2025-4-342-349
Abstract
The author examines the combined effects of corporate governance quality, stock liquidity, and asset profitability under conditions of financial constraints. Effective company management serves as an important signal for potential investors. Improving the quality of financial information not only enhances investor trust but also enables management to obtain a comprehensive view of the firm’s business activities, thereby supporting informed decision-making. The financial position of a business entity and its investment prospects are largely determined by the quality of management. Organizational capital is used as a proxy variable for corporate governance quality. Management exercises direct control over operational costs, which allows it to effectively manage changes within the firm. Tightening monetary policy not only increases the cost of borrowing but also reduces real incomes and suppresses the investment activity of Russian public companies. A high key interest rate set by the Bank of Russia leads to a sharp decline in industrial investment and extends project investment horizons. As a result, these companies are likely to forgo economically attractive investment projects. Under these conditions, they are likely to behave in line with the precautionary motive by retaining a portion of their funds to finance their business activities and adjust their capital structure amid limited access to debt financing. Stock liquidity serves as an important reference point in investors’ analysis and evaluation of stock returns. The preparation of financial reporting in accordance with international standards provides the necessary information for decision-making not only for management but also for investors, thereby sending them a signal that, under adverse conditions (external sanctions), ultimately affects the share prices.
About the Author
S. I. LutsenkoRussian Federation
Director of the Center for Economic Analysis of Law and Law Enforcement Issues, Institute for Economic Strategies, Social Sciences Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russia); member of the Expert Council of the Defense Committee of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia). Co-author of the “National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation;” co-author of the “Development Strategy of the Electric Power Grid Complex of the Russian Federation”; author of the project Contours of the Concept for the Long-Term Development of the Financial Cluster of the Russian Federation; co-author of the “Concept of the State Migration Policy of the Russian Federation for 2026–2030.” ORCID: 0000-0002-0957-5375.
Research interests: corporate governance, corporate finance, capital structure, economic analysis of law.
References
1. Lutsenko S.I. (2020). Influence of management on debt corporate policy. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 11(3): 316-323. (In Russ.)
2. Aboody D., Hughes J., Liu J. (2002). Measuring value relevance in a (possibly) inefficient market. Journal of Accounting Research, 40: 965-986.
3. Amihud Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5: 31-56.
4. Ball R., Brown P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6: 159-178.
5. Barth M., Li K., McClure C. (2023). Evolution in value relevance of accounting information. The Accounting Review, 98: 1-28.
6. Bates T., Kahle K., Stulz R. (2009). Why do US firms hold so much more cash than they used to? Journal of Finance, 64: 1985-2021.
7. Chen Y., Horstman D. (2023). Mispricing and firm investment. Working paper. Mays Business School, Texas A&M University. College Station: 1-64.
8. Cunha I., Pollet J., Denis D. (2020). Why do firms hold cash? Evidence from demographic demand shifts. The Review of Financial Studies, 33: 4102-4138.
9. Dechow P., Ge W., Schrand C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A Review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 50: 344-401.
10. Denis D., Sibilkov V. (2010). Financial constraints, investment, and the value of cash holdings. The Review of Financial Studies, 23: 247-269.
11. Duchin R. (2010). Cash holdings and corporate diversification. Journal of Finance, 65: 955-992.
12. Faulkender M., Wang R. (2006). Corporate financial policy and the value of cash. Journal of Finance, 61: 1957-1990.
13. Francis J., Schipper K., Vincent L. (2003). The relative and incremental explanatory power of earnings and alternative (to earnings) performance measures for returns. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20: 121-64.
14. Francis J., LaFond R., Olsson P., Schipper K. (2004). Costs of equity and earnings attributes. Accounting Review, 79: 967-1010.
15. Harford J., Klasa S., Maxwell W. (2014). Refinancing risk and cash holdings. Journal of Finance, 69: 975-1012.
16. Hennessy C., Levy A., Whited T. (2007). Testing Q Theory with financing frictions. Journal of Financial Economics, 83: 691-717.
17. Hong L., Liu S. (2023). Geographic diversification and corporate cash holdings. Journal of Empirical Finance, 72: 381-409.
18. Keynes J. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London, MacMillan: 403.
19. Kim C., Mauer D., Sherman A. (1998). The determinants of corporate liquidity: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 33: 335-359.
20. Liu C., Wang J. (2024). Earnings transparency and corporate cash holdings. Working Paper. Nanjing Audit University, China: 1-48.
21. Liu J., Nissim D., Thomas J. (2002). Equity valuation using multiples. Journal of Accounting Research, 40: 135-172.
22. Opler T., Pinkowitz L., Stulz R., Williamson R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52: 3-46.
23. Pinkowitz L., Williamson R. (2007). What is the market value of a dollar of corporate cash? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 19: 74-81.
24. Venter E., Emanuel D., Cahan S. (2014). The value relevance of mandatory non-GAAP earnings. Abacus, 50: 1-24.
Review
For citations:
Lutsenko S.I. Cash Holdings Management, Organizational Capital, and Stock Liquidity: The Precautionary Motive for Risk Mitigation. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2025;16(4):342-349. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2025-4-342-349


































