Impact of digitalisation on increasing the fragility of the system (on the example of ‘Digital Road’ project)

Today, digitalisation is seen as a tool that can significantly improve the efficiency of all production processes. In fact, digitalisation has led to some impressive successes, but it has also brought with it some qualitatively new risks.

The article aims to examine the impact of digitalisation on the fragility of social and technical systems, using freight transport as an example. The development of ‘Digital Road’ is expected to radically improve the freight transport service system. However, with the advent of remote process control technologies, the main customers of transport services – the mining and manufacturing industries – could see radical changes in the transport system.

According to the author, routine and repetitive types of activities are most suitable for digitalisation while innovation and uncertainty hinder it. The maximum level of uncertainty is associated with social and natural factors that set the upper limit for the process of digitalisation of production activities.

Experience with the use of digital tools in various fields suggests that the consequence of this process is uniformity, increased monopolisation of markets, reduced diversity and the dominance of a single technological solution for typical situations. This reduces the technological adaptability of the production system and increases its vulnerability to social and natural risks. The article suggests that fragility in the transport sector could be halted by using a variety of transport services that would be in demand after mining and manufacturing industries move to fully unmanned and remote-controlled technologies. 

1. Andreev K.Yu., Pavlov A.V. (2015). The human factor in the system of economic security of the Russian Federation in the field of transport infrastructure. Matters of Russian and International Law, 10: 170-181. (In Russ.)

2. Galazova S. S. (2023). Digital banking ecosystems: Comparative analysis and competition regulation in Russia. Journal of New Economy, 24(4): 82-106. DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2023-24-4-5. (In Russ.)

3. Ermakov S.V. (2016). Preventive regulation of the human factor in marine navigation. Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S.O. Makarova, 5: 39-50. DOI: 10.21821/2309-5180-2016-8-5-39-50. (In Russ.)

4. Ivashchenko N.P., Shastitko A.Е., Shpakova A.A. (2019). Smart contracts throught lens of the new institutional economics. Journal of Institutional Studies, 11(3): 64-83. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.3.064-083. (In Russ.)

5. Kleiner G.B. (2020). Intellectual economy of the digital age. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 56(1): 18-33. DOI: 10.31857/S042473880008562-7. (In Russ.)

6. Klimov S.N., Lezhenkina T.I. (2006). The human factor and safety problems in the joint-stock company Russian Railways as a foundation of transport business in XXI century. Science and Technology in Transport, 3: 14-18. (In Russ.)

7. Kondakov A.M., Kostyleva A.A. (2019). Digital identity, digital self-identifi cation, digital profile: Рroblem statement. RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education, 16(3): 207-218. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8631-2019-16-3-207-218. (In Russ.)

8. Kuprienko A.N., Grefenshteyn A.P. (2023). Analysis of accidents involving trucks. Technique and Technology of Transport, 2(29). (In Russ.)

9. Plotnikov V.A. (2020). Digitization as a logical stage in the evolution of an economic system. The Economic Revival of Russia, 2(64): 104-115. (In Russ.)

10. Sukonnikov G.V. (2022). About the digital transformation of JSC Russian Railways. The Railway Economics, 8: 30-38. (In Russ.)

11. Tagarov B.Zh. (2023). Increasing the information transparency of the business environment as a key advantage of the digital ecosystem. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law, 4-1: 122-126. (In Russ.)

12. Tsenzharik M.K., Krylova Yu.V., Steshenko V.I. (2020). Digital transformation in companies: Strategic analysis, drivers and models. St. Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies, 36(3): 390-420. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2020.303. (In Russ.)

13. Gerson A. (2023). Stranding of the mega-ship Ever Given in the Suez Canal: Causes, consequences, and lessons to be learned. In: Lutmar C., Rubinovitz Z. (eds.). The Suez Canal: Past lessons and future challenges. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15670-0_12.

14. Rakha A., El‑Aasar K. (2024). The impact of the belt and road initiative on the Suez Canal cargo trade. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 9: 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-024-00167-y.