Preview

Strategic decisions and risk management

Advanced search

The interrelation between innovations and knowledge management systems: Justification and classification of knowledge-based innovations

https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2025-1-35-46

Abstract

This article exexamines the role of knowledge in the innovation process, highlighting knowledge creation as a key factor in successful innovation. Current economic realities underscore the importance of knowledge as a fundamental resource for creating unique competitive advantage. The relationship between innovation and the knowledge creation process, which is often overlooked or underestimated, is explored.

The article presents different approaches to defining and classifying innovation and knowledge creation models. The authors propose a classification approach for knowledge-based innovations based on parameters such as the type of knowledge according to novelty level (completely new knowledge vs. use of existing knowledge), knowledge creation (market knowledge vs. empirical knowledge), and knowledge characteristics (explicit vs. implicit). Empirical research on knowledge-based innovation has allowed us to complement the classification approach with information on the source of knowledge acquisition for innovation creation - a critical feature for company managers.

The conclusion underlines the importance of knowledge creation and integration for the successful implementation of innovation.

About the Authors

N. V. Linder
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia), JSC Goznak (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation

Doctor of economic sciences, professor, professor of the Department of Strategic and Innovative Development, Faculty of Higher School of Management, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia); head of the Marketing Department of Goznak JSC (Moscow, Russia). ORCID: 0000-0002-4724-2344.

Research interests: strategy and development management companies, formation of development strategy of industrial companies in the context of the fourth industrial revolution, innovation transformation of business models, dynamics and development of e-business development strategies of companies in the energy sector in the fourth industrial revolution, exit strategies of Russian companies on international markets.



P. D. Serezhin
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia), LLC Boutique Hotel (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation

Scientific assistant, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia); general director, ‘Boutique Hotel’ LLC (Moscow, Russia).

Research interests: the introduction of innovations and their impact on the efficiency of companies, the activities of small and medium-sized businesses, knowledge-based innovations, their typology, knowledge management in organisations.



References

1. Linder N.V. (2021). Transformation of the innovative behavior of Russian industrial enterprises in the context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: dissertation, dr. sci. (econ.), Moscow, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.)

2. Abernathy W.J., Clark K.B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1): 3-22.

3. Afuah A. (2023). Redefining firm boundaries in the face of the internet: Аre firms really shrinking? Academy of Management Review, 28(1): 34-53.

4. Ahlskog M., Bruch J., Jackson M. (2017). Knowledge integration in manufacturing technology development. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(8): 1035-1054.

5. Botega L.F.D.C., Da Silva J.C. (2020). An artificial intelligence approach to support knowledge management on the selection of creativity and innovation techniques. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(5): 1107-1130.

6. Chandy R.K., Tellis G.J. (1998). Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4): 474-487.

7. Dewar R.D., Dutton J.E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11): 1422-1433.

8. Drucker P.F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York, Harper & Row Publishers.

9. Fischer G. (2001). Communities of interest: Learning through the interaction of multiple knowledge systems. In: Proceedings of the 24th IRIS Conference. Bergen, Department of Information Science, 1: 1-13.

10. Frascati Manual (2015). A summary of the Frascati manual. Main definitions and conventions for the measurement of research and experimental development (R&D). OCDE/GD(94)84. http://www.oecd.org/document/6/0,2340,en_2649_34451_33828550_1_1_1_1,00.html.

11. Garcia R., Calantone R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: А literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management: 19(2): 110-132.

12. Hagedorn T.J., Krishnamurty S., Grosse I.R. (2018). A knowledge-based method for innovative design for additive manufacturing supported by modular ontologies. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 18(2): 021009.

13. Henderson R.M., Clark K.B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 9-30.

14. Liu Q., Wang K., Li Y., Chen C., Li W. (2022). A novel function-structure concept network construction and analysis method for a smart product design system. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 51: 101502.

15. Liu Q., Zhang J., Fang P., Shi Q., Liu X., Li D. (2025). Knowledge management for product innovation design based on dual-layer concept network. International Journal of Modern Physics, C: 2442010.

16. McDermott C.M., O’Connor G.C. (2002). Managing radical innovation: An overview of emergent strategy issues. Journal of Product Innovation Management: 19(6): 424-438.

17. Nonaka I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1): 14-37.

18. Nonaka I., Nishiguchi T. (2001). Knowledge emergence: Social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

19. Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. (1995).The knowledge-creating company. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

20. Oslo Manual (2018). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. European Commission. http://www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/35/61/2367580.pdf.

21. Pedersen C.Ø., Dalum B. (2004). Incremental versus radical change - The case of the digital North Denmark program. Paper presented at 10th International Schumpeter Society Conference 2004, 9-12 Juni. Milano, Bocconi University.

22. Polanyi M. (1967). Sense-giving and sense-reading. Philosophy, 42(162): 301-325.

23. Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Strategy, 5(3) 60-78.

24. Rogers E.M., Williams D. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. Glencoe, IL, The Free Press.

25. Tushman M.L., Anderson, P., & O’Reilly, C. (1997). Technology cycles innovation streams and ambidextrous organisations. In: Managing strategic innovation and change: A collection of readings. New York, Oxford University Press.

26. Urabe K. (1988). Innovation and the Japanese management system. In: Urabe K., Child J., Kagono T. (eds.). Innovation and management international comparisons. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.

27. Utterback J.M. (1994). One point of view: Radical innovation and corporate regeneration. Research-Technology Management, 37(4): 10.

28. Yang J., Quan H., Zeng Y. (2022). Knowledge: The good, the bad, and the ways for designer creativity. Journal of Engineering Design, 33(12): 945-968.

29. Zack M. (1998). What knowledge-problems can information technology help to solve? AMCIS 1998 Proceedings, 216.

30. Zhang C., Kordestani H., Shadabfar M. (2023). A combined review of vibration control strategies for high-speed trains and railway infrastructures: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 42(1): 272-291.


Review

For citations:


Linder N.V., Serezhin P.D. The interrelation between innovations and knowledge management systems: Justification and classification of knowledge-based innovations. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2025;16(1):35-46. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2025-1-35-46

Views: 248


ISSN 2618-947X (Print)
ISSN 2618-9984 (Online)