Preview

Strategic decisions and risk management

Advanced search

Integration of coal mining and metallurgy sectors: Transforming partnership models for sustainable development

https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2025-1-20-34

Abstract

The article examines the characteristics of traditional partnerships and those created to achieve sustainable development goals.

Although perceived as a positive contribution to solving sustainable development problems, numerous studies demonstrate the ineffectiveness of such partnerships. This presents researchers and practitioners with the critical challenge of understanding how to improve partnership effectiveness.

An empirical analysis of partnerships in the coal mining and metallurgical sector was carried out. Five types of relationship clusters were identified: partnerships focused on economic benefits; partnerships focused on scientific and technical cooperation; partnerships focused on joint value creation; partnerships focused on new opportunities; and partnerships focused on relationships. It was concluded that in the coal mining and metallurgy sectors, partnerships for economic benefits and partnerships for scientific and technical cooperation predominate. In this context, it is necessary to develop a mechanism aimed at improving common technologies and economic indicators in order to ensure the effectiveness of the partnerships created to pursue sustainable development goals.

The article aims to develop and analyse new models of interaction between the coal mining and metallurgy sectors, with a view to improving environmental and economic sustainability.

About the Authors

A. V. Trachuk
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia); Goznak JSC (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation

Doctor of economic sciences, professor, head of the Department of Strategic and Innovative Development, Faculty of Higher School of Management, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia); general director of Goznak JSC (Moscow, Russia). ORCID: 0000-0003-2188-7192.

Research interests: strategy and management of the company’s development, innovation, entrepreneurship and modern business models in the financial and real sectors of the economy, dynamics and development of e-business, operating experience and prospects for the development of natural monopolies.



V. A. Svadkovsky
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation

Senior Lecturer at the Department of Strategic and Innovative Development, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia).

Research interests: digital technologies and the effects of their implementation, the activities of large industrial coal mining companies, operational efficiency.



References

1. Belozertsev V.N., Belozertseva L.G. (2023). Analysis of competitive forces in the coal industry. Economics and Management: 45-58. (In Russ.)

2. Bolshakov V.I., Tuboltsev L.G. (2022). The state and prospects of energy saving in the metallurgical industry. Bulletin of Metallurgy: 45-52. (In Russ.)

3. Boranbayeva B.M., Myrzagulova A.T., Tazhiev Sh.Kh., Maishina Zh.G. (2020). A promising method for the production of iron-containing alloys from ore raw materials. Science and Technology of Kazakhstan, 4: 25-26. https://doi.org/10.48081/VTUX4454. (In Russ.)

4. Vorobyov I.S., Vorotnikov A.M. (2022). Prospects for the development and prioritization of hydrogen energy in Russia and in the world. Bulletin of Energy: 45-58. (In Russ.)

5. Dunikov D.O. (ed.) (2017). Hydrogen energy technologies: materials of the seminar of the Laboratory of the VET Institute of Physics and Technology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow, Institute of Physics and Technology of the RAS, 1. (In Russ.)

6. Islamov S.R. (2010). Energy-efficient use of brown coals based on the concept of ‘Thermocox’: abstract of the dissertation ... dr. sci. (tech.). Krasnoyarsk. (In Russ.)

7. Islamov S.R. (2017). Brown coal as the basis of a new generation of ferrous metallurgy. Coal, 7: 17-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2017-7-17-21. (In Russ.)

8. Islamov S.R. (2018). The future of coal: in search of a new paradigm. Coal, 9: 26-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2018-9-26-32. (In Russ.)

9. Knelts A. (2022). CCUS Industry in Russia: The government is expected to follow the rules of the game, reduce risks and finance. Creon Market Monitor: CCUS-2022, 15-22. (In Russ.)

10. Kudinova O. (2011). The strategy of modernization of the chemical industry in developed countries. The Chemical Journal, August: 20-21. (In Russ.)

11. Kuznetsov B.N. (1996). New approaches in chemical processing of fossil coals. New Approaches, 6: 50-51. (In Russ.)

12. Nefedov B.K., Gorlov E.G., Nefedov K.B. (2008). Modern industrial technologies for the production of hydrogen and synthesis gas from coal. Catalysis in Industry, 4: 11-12. (In Russ.)

13. Polevanov V.P. (2020). The search for natural hydrogen deposits in Russia as a basis for integration into a new technological order. Global Subsoil Use, 10: 10-11. (In Russ.)

14. Potapov B.B., Pinchuk V.A. (2006). Problems and prospects of using coal and its processed products in metallurgy. Integrated Technologies and Energy Saving, 2:122-123. (In Russ.)

15. Trachuk A.V., Linder N.V. (2018). Adaptation of Russian firms to changes in the external environment: the role of e-business tools. Management Sciences, 1: 61. (In Russ.)

16. Friedman Yu.A., Rechko G.N., Loginova E.Yu. (2019). The concept of choosing and transforming the Kemerovo Region’s development models and their synchronization with the Kuzbass-2035 strategy. Region: Economics and Social Policy, 4 (104): 226-244. DOI: 10.15372/REG20190410. (In Russ.)

17. Adams C., Alldredge K., Kohli S. (2024). State of the consumer 2024: What’s now and what’s next. McKinsey & Company. https://www. mckinsey. com/industries/consumerpackaged-goods/our-insights/state-ofconsumer.

18. Albani M., Henderson K. (2014). Creating partnerships for sustainability. New York, McKinsey & Company.

19. Bendell J., Collins E., Roper J. (2010). Beyond partnerism: Toward a more expansive research agenda on multi-stakeholder collaboration for responsible business. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(6): 351-355.

20. Biermann F., Pattberg P., Van Asselt H., Zelli F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9: 14-40. DOI: 10. 1162/glep.2009.9.4.14.

21. Biermann F., Pattberg P., Van Asselt H., Zelli F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4): 14-40.

22. Campbell K.W. (1985). Strong motion attenuation relations: A ten-year perspective. Earthquake spectra, 1(4): 759-804.

23. Clarke A., Fuller M. (2010). Collaborative strategic management: Strategy formulation and implementation by multi-organizational cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94: 85-101.

24. Clarke A., MacDonald A. (2019). Outcomes to partners in multi-stakeholder cross-sector partnerships: A resource-based view. Business & Society, 58(2): 298-332.

25. Cole D.H. (2015). Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Climate Change, 5: 114-118

26. Dyer J.H., Singh H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 660-679.

27. Elkjaer B., Simpson B. (2011). Pragmatism: A lived and living philosophy. What can it offer to contemporary organization theory? In: Philosophy and organization theory: 55-84. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

28. Eweje G. (2007). Strategic partnerships between MNEs and civil society: The post-WSSD perspectives. Sustainable Development, 15(1): 15-27.

29. Foley P. (2013). National government responses to Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) fisheries certification: Insights from Atlantic Canada. New Political Economy, 18(2): 284-307.

30. Glasbergen P. (2007). Setting the scene: The partnership paradigm in the making. In: Glasbergen F., Biermann F., Mol A.P.J. (eds.). Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: Reflections on theory and practice. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar: 1-29.

31. Gummesson E. (1999). Total relationship marketing: Experimenting with a synthesis of research frontiers. Australasian Marketing Journal, 7(1): 72-85.

32. Hahn T., Preuss L., Pinkse J., Figge F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4): 463-487.

33. Kates R.W., Parris T.M., Leiserowitz A.A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment, 47(3): 8-21.

34. Keohane R.O., Victor D.G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9: 7-23.

35. Koschmann M.A., Kuhn T.R., Pfarrer M.D. (2012). A communicative framework of value in cross-sector partnerships. Academy of Management Review, 37(3): 332-354.

36. Macdonald F.A., Swanson-Hysell N.L., Park Y., Lisiecki L., Jagoutz O. (2019). Arc-continent collisions in the tropics set Earth’s climate state. Science, 364(6436): 181-184.

37. Murphy D.F., Bendell J. (1997). In the company of partners: Business, environmental groups and sustainable development post-Rio. Bristol, Policy Press.

38. Pattberg P., Widerberg O. (2016). Transnational multistakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: conditions for success. Ambio, 45(1): 42-51.

39. Porter M.E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press, Collier Macmillan.

40. Prescott D., Stibbe D. (2015). Collaboration for the SDGs: Exploring the support system for effective partnering. https://thepartneringinitiative.org/publications/research- papers/collaboration-for-the-sdgs-support-system/.

41. Prescott D., Stibbe D. (2015). Unleashing the power of business: A practical Roadmap to systematically engage business as a partner in development. The Partnering Initiative.

42. Redclift M. (2005). Sustainable development (1987-2005): An oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13(4): 212-227.

43. Rockstrom J., Steffen W., Noone K., Persson A., Chapin III F.S., Lambin E., Lenton T.M., Scheffer M. (2009). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14: 32.

44. Shutko A. (2020). Sustainable business models: The role of environmental factors in economic performance. Sustainability, 12(10): 4200.

45. Teece D.J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6): 285-305.

46. Turcotte M.F., Pasquero J. (2001). The paradox of multistakeholder collaborative roundtables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37(4): 447-464.

47. Utting P., Zammit A. (2009). United Nations-business partnerships: Good intentions and contradictory agendas. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(1): 39-56.

48. Wilson D.T., Jantrania S. (1994). Understanding the value of a relationship. Asia-Australia Marketing Journal, 2(1): 55-66.

49. Zammit A. (2003). Development at risk: Rethinking UN-business partnerships. Geneva, South Centre. https://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/globalization/business/docs/report5.pdf.

50. Zelli F. (2011). The fragmentation of the global climate governance architecture. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2: 255-270.

51. Zhang Y., Li X., Zhao H. (2021). Cluster cooperation and its impact on sustainable development in the mining industry: A case study from China. Resources Policy, 74: 102200.


Review

For citations:


Trachuk A.V., Svadkovsky V.A. Integration of coal mining and metallurgy sectors: Transforming partnership models for sustainable development. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2025;16(1):20-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2025-1-20-34

Views: 97


ISSN 2618-947X (Print)
ISSN 2618-9984 (Online)