Preview

Strategic decisions and risk management

Advanced search

ARE HUMAN FACTOR RISKS IN THE ACTIVITIES OF SCIENTIFIC DESIGN ORGANISATIONS SUBJECT TO RELIABLE MEASUREMENT?

https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2024-3-237-251

Abstract

The article considers the problem of measuring risks and threats created by the nature and charac-teristics of the human factor and affecting the efficiency and safety of activities at the micro level of the economy, in particular, in the environment of scientific and design organisations during the development of restoration projects at immovable cultural heritage sites located in St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region. A literature review of sources covering the problem under study is carried out. The objective of the study is formulated, which consists in attempting to measure the impact of human factor risks on the efficiency of scientific and design work, and the tasks are outlined, the solution of which will allow the objective to be achieved. The study focuses on the assessment of complex damage and indirect losses, and the subject is defined as the methods for measuring the impact of these risks. The methods and tools of the planned study are defined. A number of intermediate author՚s results are obtained, clarifying the nature of the human factor, the conceptual apparatus of the topic, the classification of risks, threats and dangers that can cause significant damage to an economic entity, market activity, business reputation and brand value. Partial results were discussed and five-stage conclusions were drawn. Promising directions for further joint research have been identified by the authors of the article, which can be considered as the starting point and the beginning of the path in the systematic study of the problem of human factor hazard metrics. 

About the Authors

I. S. Bogatyrev
Research and Design Institute ‘Spetsrestavratsiya’ (St. Petersburg, Russia)
Russian Federation

Head of the design team of the St. Petersburg Research and Design Institute ‘Spetsrestavratsiya’ (St. Petersburg, Russia). 

Research interests: study and analysis of restoration and construction processes and methods used at cultural heritage sites, assessment of their effectiveness. 



A. N. Tsatsulin
North-West Institute of Management of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation (St. Petersburg, Russia)
Russian Federation

Doctor of economic sciences, professor, professor of the Department of Management of the North-West Institute of Management, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation (St. Petersburg, Russia). 

Research interests: pricing mechanisms, analysis of the economic activities of companies in the real sector of the economy. 



References

1. Batanova S.V. (2008). The problem of reliability of construction organizations and ways to solve it. In: Current problems of regional economic management: materials of the V All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, April 17-18, 2008: 127. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Engineering and Economics. (In Russ.)

2. Bogatyrev I.S., Tsatsulin A.N. (2024). Once again about the problems of preserving real estate cultural heritage from the standpoint of collective and individual consumer perception. Management Consulting, 1: 174-193. (In Russ.)

3. Bulochnikov P.A., Vinogradov D.V. (2008). Conceptual provisions for regulating investment activity in the region. In: Current problems of managing the economy of the region: materials of the V All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, April 17-18, 2008: 146. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University of Engineering and Economics. (In Russ.)

4. Gorsky M.A., Labsker L.G. (2020). Synthetic Wald - Savage criterion for playing with nature and its economic applications. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law, 4-2: 179-193. (In Russ.)

5. Ilyinskaya T.I. (2010). Theoretical foundations of the formation and provision of competitiveness of human capital in economic systems of innovation type. Thesis of the cand. sci. diss. (econ.). St. Petersburg, State Economic University. (In Russ.)

6. Kardanskaya N.L. (2017). Decision making. Moscow, Unity-Dana. (In Russ.)

7. Kasyanenko T.G. (2008). Methods of qualitative analysis in the investment risk management system. In: Current problems of regional economic management: materials of the V All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, April 17-18, 2008: 184. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University of Engineering and Economics. (In Russ.)

8. Kashina O.N. (2004). Conceptual principles and approaches to measuring and forecasting social risks and building social security. Voprosy statistiki, 4: 43-49. (In Russ.)

9. Kolganov A.I., Buzgalin A.V. (2005). Economic Comparative studies: comparative analysis of economic systems. Moscow, INFRA-M. (In Russ.)

10. Kordovich V.I. (2008). Methodology for measuring the impact of diversification on reducing fluctuations in production results and their risks. Voprosy statistiki, 6: 70-71. (In Russ.)

11. Kuznetsov Yu.N., Kuzubov V.I., Voloshchenko A.B. (1980). Mathematical programming. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola. (In Russ.)

12. Lenin V.I. (1981). Childhood disease of “leftism” in communism. In: Lenin V.I. The Complete Works, 41. Moscow, Politizdat. (In Russ.)

13. Lenin V.I. (1974). Synopsis of Hegel’s book “Lectures on the history of philosophy.” In: Lenin V.I. The Complete Works, 29. Moscow, Politizdat. (In Russ.)

14. Marx K., Engels F. (1962). Categories of dialectics. In: Marx K., Engels F. The Collected Works, 25(2). Moscow, Gospolitizdat. (In Russ.)

15. Olinovich N.A. (2010). Error protection system as one of the methods for ensuring traffic safety. In: Innovative economics and industrial policy of the region (Ecoindustrial-2010), 2: 377-381. St. Petersburg, Publishing House of Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University. (In Russ.)

16. Russel S.J., Norvig P. (2006). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Thansl from Eng. Moscow, Williams. (In Russ.)

17. Semerkova M.M. (2005). Development of a system for minimizing the risks of entrepreneurial structures. Thesis of the cand. sci. diss. (econ.). St. Petersburg, Baltic Academy of Tourism and Entrepreneurship. (In Russ.)

18. Smirnov M. (2002). Responsible employee. Personnel Mix, 1(8): 70-72. (In Russ.)

19. Tretyakov V.P. (1993). Psychology of safety of nuclear power plant operation. Moscow, Energoatomizdat. (In Russ.)

20. Tumanishvili D.G. (1932). From the practice of accident classification. Power Stations, 6: 32-42. (In Russ.)

21. Ushanov P.V. (2011). The role of the human factor in the formation of risks of destructive development of the life cycle of an enterprise. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 3: 80-85.

22. Hunt K., Krivoshapka I. (2020). Human factor: How to manage this risk. Risk Management. Practice, 3. https://risk-practice.ru/magazine/116/. (In Russ.)

23. Tsatsulin A.N., Bykov A.I. (2023). Analysis of economic activity of enterprises in the real sector of the economy and financial organizations. St. Petersburg, Asterion. (In Russ.)

24. Cheprasov V.Yu. (2011). Adaptation of civil servants to activities in conditions of psychological overload. Management Consulting, 4: 48-55. (In Russ.)

25. Shcherbatykh Yu.V. (2012). Psychology of stress and correction methods. St. Petersburg, Peter. (In Russ.)

26. Badiou A. (2007). Being and еvent. London, New York, Continuum.

27. Frantz J.P., Rhoades T.P. (1993). Human factors: A task-analytic approach to the temporal and spatial placement of product warnings. Human Factors, 35(4): 719-730.

28. Howe N., Strauss W. (2008). Millennials go to college: Strategies for a new generation on campus. Great Falls, LifeCourse Associates.

29. Savage L.J. (1981). The writings of Leonard Jimmie Savage: А memorial selection. Washington, The American Statistical Association and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.


Review

For citations:


Bogatyrev I.S., Tsatsulin A.N. ARE HUMAN FACTOR RISKS IN THE ACTIVITIES OF SCIENTIFIC DESIGN ORGANISATIONS SUBJECT TO RELIABLE MEASUREMENT? Strategic decisions and risk management. 2024;15(3):237-251. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2024-3-237-251

Views: 243


ISSN 2618-947X (Print)
ISSN 2618-9984 (Online)