SYSTEMS LITERACY – А NEW PERSPECTIVE FOR INNOVATION MANAGERS AND ENGINEERS
https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2024-2-118-133
Abstract
The article presents the results of a study that confirms the high relevance of developing a new critical competence among specialists involved in technological modernisation and import substitution projects – systems literacy, which requires a holistic vision of the interdisciplinary relationships of complex systems. The authors demonstrate that systems literacy is based on systems thinking and systems engineering methodologies, which are particularly relevant to the development of sociotechnical systems that include components of different nature, and their operation throughout their life cycle. An analysis of the differences between engineering and management views of complexity has been carried out, justifying the need to train innovative teams that bring together specialists from different disciplines. The requirements for a new generation of educational products providing advanced training in engineering and economic skills necessary for the development of integrated solutions to complex problems are formulated, and the relevant experience of the Department of Energy and Industrial The management systems of the Ural Federal University, tested in the training of high-tech managers, are presented. The specificity of the application of systems literacy is illustrated by the example of the energy transition problem, which directly determines the achievement of technological sovereignty and involves deep transformations in various industries and market entities.
About the Authors
L. D. GitelmanRussian Federation
Doctor of economic sciences, professor, professor of the Department of Energy and Industrial Management Systems, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (Ekaterinburg, Russia). WOS Research ID: AHB-8473-2022; Scopus ID: 55806230600.
Research interests: proactive management, organizational transformations, sustainable energy, management education.
T. B. Gavrilova
Russian Federation
Candidate of economic sciences, associate professor, associate professor of the Department of Energy and Industrial Management Systems, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (Ekaterinburg, Russia). Scopus ID: 57190430748.
Research interests: systems engineering, business analytics, information technology in management.
M. V. Kozhevnikov
Russian Federation
Doctor of economic sciences, associate professor, head of the Department of Energy and Industrial Management Systems, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (Ekaterinburg, Russia). WOS Research ID: AAB-6693-2020; Scopus ID: 55805368400; ORCID: 0000-0003-4463-5625.
Research interests: knowledge-intensive service, innovative industrial development, management education.
References
1. Balashov М.М. (2023). Analysis of key directions and proposals to minimise the economic impact of the global energy transition on large energy-intensive industrial consumers of electricity and capacity. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 14(2): 164-179. DOI: 10.17747/2618-947X-2023-2-164-179. (In Russ.)
2. Bogomolov A.V. (2022). Some aspects of ensuring innovative development of the national economy based on improving the system of training engineering personnel. Innovation, 2: 13-17. (In Russ.)
3. Gitelman L.D. (2011). Management is your job. Create know-how and act! Moscow, Infra-M. (In Russ.)
4. Gitelman L.D., Isayev A.P., Kozhevnikov M.V., Gavrilova T.B. (2022). Interdisciplinary competencies of managers for a technological breakthrough. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 13(3): 182-198. DOI: 10.17747/2618-947X-2022-3-182-198. (In Russ.)
5. Gitelman L.D., Isayev A.P., Kozhevnikov M.V., Gavrilova T.B. (2023a). Innovation managers for the country’s technological sovereignty. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 14(2): 118-135. DOI: 10.17747/2618-947X-2023-2-118-135. (In Russ.)
6. Gitelman L.D., Kozhevnikov M.V. (2023). On urgent changes in training of managers and engineers for the new energy industry. Energy Specialist, 10: 3-11. (In Russ.)
7. Gitelman L.D., Kozhevnikov M.V., Ratnikov B.E. (2023b). The Energy transition: A guide for realists. Moscow, Solon-Press. (In Russ.)
8. Ermolov I.L. (2022). On areas of work to improve the training of engineering personnel in Russia. Innovation, 2: 8-12. (In Russ.)
9. Gitelman L.D., Isayev A.P. (eds.). Professionals in competition for the future. Advanced training for leadership in the digital industry. (2021). Moscow, Solon-Press. (In Russ.)
10. Trachuk A.V., Linder N.V. (2023). The impact of digital platforms on industrial enterprises: Аn empirical analysis in the context of external sanction pressure. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 14(2): 150-163. DOI: 10.17747/2618-947X-2023-2-150-163. (In Russ.)
11. Ulrich D., Jung A. (2022). New organizational model. How to build a strong and flexible organization. Moscow, Bombora. (In Russ.)
12. Axelrod R., Cohen M. (1999). Harnessing complexity: Organizational implications of a scientific frontier. New York, Simon and Schuster.
13. Bone M.A., Blackburn M.R., Rhodes D.H., Cohen D.N., Guerrero J.A. (2019). Transforming systems engineering through digital engineering. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 16(4): 339-355. DOI: 10.1177/1548512917751873.
14. Checkland P. (1978). The origins and nature of “hard” systems thinking. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 5(2): 99-110.
15. Checkland P. (1999). Systems thinking, systems practice. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
16. Dubberly H. (2014). A systems literacy manifesto. Proceedings of RSD3, Third Symposium of Relating Systems Thinking to Design, 2014. http://openresearch.ocadu.ca/id/eprint/2058/.
17. Hitchins D. (2009). What are the general principles applicable to systems? INCOSE Insight, 12(4): 59-63. DOI: 10.1002/inst.200912459.
18. Hybertson D. (2009). Model-oriented systems engineering science: A unifying framework for traditional and complex systems. Series in complex and enterprise systems engineering. Boston, Auerbach Publications.
19. Jackson W.S. (2016). Evaluation of resilience principles for engineered systems. Unpublished PhD, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
20. Kline S. (1995). Foundations of multidisciplinary thinking. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
21. Koestler A. (1967). The ghost in the machine. New York, Macmillan Stems.
22. Madni A., Jackson S. (2009). Towards a conceptual framework for resilience engineering. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Systems Journal, 3(2): 181-191.
23. Martin J. (2004). The seven samurai of systems engineering: Dealing with the complexity of 7 interrelated systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual INCOSE International Symposium, 2004. https://incose.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2004.tb00509.x.
24. Rousseau D., Pennotti M., Brook P. (2022). Systems engineering’s evolving guidelines. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JibL44sUh0ztefZQ5Rfy4kGiodXIy63n/view.
25. Sheard S., Cook S., Honour E., Hybertson D., Krupa J., McEver J., McKinney D., Ondrus P., Ryan A., Scheurer R., Singer J., Sparber J., White B. (2015). A complexity primer for systems engineers. https://www.incose.org/docs/default-source/ProductsPublications/a-complexity-primer-for-systems-engineers.pdf.
26. Sheard S.A., Mostashari A. (2009). Principles of complex systems for systems engineering. Systems Engineering, 12(4): 295-311.
27. Sillitto H.G. (2010). Design principles for ultra-large-scale systems. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual INCOSE International Symposium, 2010. https://web.mst.edu/lib-circ/files/Special%20Collections/INCOSE2010/Design%20principles%20for%20Ultra-Large-Scale%20(ULS)%20SYstems.pdf.
28. Sweeney L.B. (2018). Food systems, climate systems, laundry systems: The time for systems literacy is now! https://thesystemsthinker.com/%EF%BB%BFfood-systems-climate-systems-laundry-systems-the-time-for-systems-literacy-is-now/.
29. Verhoef P.C., Broekhuizen T., Bart Y., Bhattacharya A., Dong J.Q., Fabian N., Haenlein M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122: 889-901. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022.
30. Weaver W. (1948). Science and complexity. American Science, 36: 536-544.
Review
For citations:
Gitelman L.D., Gavrilova T.B., Kozhevnikov M.V. SYSTEMS LITERACY – А NEW PERSPECTIVE FOR INNOVATION MANAGERS AND ENGINEERS. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2024;15(2):118-133. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2024-2-118-133