THE IMPACT OF INNOVATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES IN RUSSIA: ЕMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2023-4-384-399
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the impact of different types of innovation on the efficiency of Russian SMEs. The purpose of the study is to assess the importance of different types of innovation for Russian SMEs and to determine the impact of types of innovation on the efficiency and competitiveness of SMEs. The research methodology involves a consistent approach combining qualitative and quantitative analysis. As a collection of information, a survey was conducted among owners of small and medium-sized enterprises in Russia on the use of innovations in the course of business activities in the last three years (2020–2023) and their impact on the company՚s performance. In addition, the experiences of some participants were explored through in-depth interviews. In total,
112 entrepreneurs took part in the survey. The results of the study showed that innovations are used by the vast majority of small and medium-sized enterprises in Russia. There is no stable relationship between the size of enterprises and the innovations they choose, although in some cases we can say that certain companies tend to a certain type of innovation depending on the number of employees. Organisational innovations are the least popular in enterprises innovation, and the greatest marketing; marketing innovations showed the highest percentage of negative experiences during implementation, despite the fact that they are the most popular category of innovations.
The majority of respondents see an improvement in the financial situation of the company according to various criteria and are satisfied with the results of innovation; at the same time, the larger the company, the more goals it pursues trough innovations. The smaller the business, the more interested it is in solving specific problems to increase sales, profits and customer loyalty. The larger the company, the more it follows the 360 strategy: that is, it pays attention to the creation of new goods and services, as well as to the introduction of innovations in production processes.
About the Author
P. D. SererzhinRussian Federation
Scientific assistant, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia); general director, ‘Boutique Hotel’ LLC (Moscow, Russia).
Research interests: the introduction of innovations and their impact on the efficiency of companies, the activities of small and medium-sized businesses, knowledge-based innovations, their typology, knowledge management in organisations.
References
1. Bouwman H., Nikou S., Reuver M. de (2019). Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs? Telecommunications Policy, 43(9): 101828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101828.
2. Expósito A., Fernández-Serrano J., Liñán F. (2018). The impact of open innovation on SMEs’ innovation outcomes: New empirical evidence from a multidimensional approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 32(5): 558-577. DOI: 10.1108/JOCM-09-2018-0253.
3. Ioanid A., Deselnicu D.C., Militaru G. (2018). The impact of social networks on SMEs’ innovation potential. Procedia Manufacturing, 22: 936-941 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.133.
4. Klewitz J., Hansen E. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65: 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017.
5. Lee R., Lee J.H., Garrett T.C. (2017). Synergy effects of innovation on fir performance. Journal of Business Research, 99: 507-515.
6. Saridakis G., Idris B., Hansen J.M., Dana L.P. (2019). SMEs’ internationalisation: When does innovation matter? Journal of Business Research, 96: 250-263.
7. Shashi, Centobelli P., Cerchione R., Singh R. (2019). The impact of leanness and innovativeness on environmental and financial performance: Insights from Indian SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 212: 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.011.
8. Tan K.S., Chong S.C., Lin B., Eze U.C. (2009). Internet-based ICT adoption: Evidence from Malaysian SMEs. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 109(2): 224-244.
9. Vermeulen P.A.M., Jong D., O’Shaughnessy J.P.J. (2005). Identifying key determinants for new product introductions and firm performance in small service firms. Service Industry Journal, 25(5): 625-640.
10. Vrande V., Jong J.D., Vanhaverbeke W., Rochemont M.D. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6): 423-437.
11. Wang X. (2018). Catering innovation: Entrepreneurship and the acquisition market. Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise, research paper 18-27.
12. Westerberg M., Wincent J. (2008). Entrepreneur characteristics and management control: Contingency influences on business performance. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 20(1): 37.
13. Yu X., Yan J., Assimakopoulos D. (2015). Case analysis of imitative innovation in Chinese manufacturing SMEs: Products, features, barriers and competences for transition. International Journal of Information Management, 35(4): 520-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.03.003.
Review
For citations:
Sererzhin P.D. THE IMPACT OF INNOVATION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES IN RUSSIA: ЕMPIRICAL ANALYSIS. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2023;14(4):384-399. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2023-4-384-399