产品和流程创新对财务业绩的影响：对俄罗斯公司的实证研究
https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2023-3-278-291
摘要
俄罗斯公司的产品和流程创新与财务结果之间的关系在很大程度上仍未被充分研究，特别是对于俄罗斯公司而言。对该主题的出版物进行的分析显示了正面和负面的关联。然而，基于俄罗斯公司的实证研究却很少。本研究基于对137家俄罗斯公司的实证数据进行了研究。结果表明，对研发的投资对公司的财务业绩产生了积极影响，而这些业绩则取决于公司所进行的创新类型（产品或流程）。
通过进行与产品和流程创新相关的实验设计和科学研究，能够提高俄罗斯公司的销售利润率，从而改善其财务业绩。此外，得出结论：流程创新与财务结果之间的关系比产品创新与财务结果之间的关系更为密切，因此，开发和实施流程创新更为有利。
关于作者
O. M. Orlovtseva
俄罗斯国立财政金融大学卡卢加分校 (俄罗斯，卡卢加)
俄罗斯联邦
俄罗斯联邦
俄罗斯国立财政金融大学卡卢加分校经济学、金融与人文学科系主任 (俄罗斯，卡卢加），经济学博士、副教授。
科研兴趣领域：商业分析、财务管理、创新投资。
E. V. Gubanova
俄罗斯国立财政金融大学卡卢加分校 (俄罗斯，卡卢加)
俄罗斯联邦
俄罗斯联邦
俄罗斯国立财政金融大学卡卢加分校 (俄罗斯，卡卢加），经济学博士、副教授，科学工作副主任。SPIN: 8710-5253; ORCID: 0000-0001-7922-8400.
科研兴趣领域：俄罗斯公司的创新活动、战略发展的工具和方法。
参考
1. Гарипова Г.Р. (2011). Оценка влияния управленческих инноваций на эффективность производственно-экономических систем Российской Федерации. Вестник Казанского технологического университета, 24: 205–213.
2. Домнич Е. (2022). Влияние продуктовых и процессных инноваций на производительность: обзор эмпирических исследований. Форсайт, 3(16): 68–82.
3. Козлов В.А., Кадырова Ж.Ш. (2019). Влияние управленческих и технологических инноваций на эффективность деятельности организации. В: Новая парадигма развития менеджмента: гипотезы, концепции, практики. М., Русайнс, 133–137.
4. Линдер Н.В. (2021). Трансформация инновационного поведения российских промышленных предприятий в условиях четвертой промышленной революции: дис. … д.э.н. М., Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации.
5. Трачук А.В., Линдер Н.В. (2020). Влияние инноваций на эффективность: исследование российских компаний оборонной промышленности. Полет, 8: 16–27.
6. Фаязова С.И. (2020). Влияние инноваций на экспортную деятельность: эмпирический анализ российских компаний. Стратегические решения и риск-менеджмент, 1: 18–23.
7. Alvarez R., Bravo-Ortega C., Zahler A. (2015). Innovation and productivity in services: Evidence from Chile. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 51(3): 593–611.
8. Acosta M., Coronado D., Romero C. (2015). Linking public support, R&D, innovation and productivity: New evidence from the Spanish food industry. Food Policy, 57: 50–61.
9. Baumann J., Kritikos A.S. (2016). The link between R&D, innovation and productivity: Are micro firms different? Bonn, Institute for the Study of Labor, discussion paper 9734.
10. Cassoni A., Ramada-Sarasola M. (2012). The returns to innovation in Latin America: Inexistent or mismeasured? Latin American Business Review, 13(2): 141–169.
11. Chen T.C., Guo D.Q., Chen H.M., Wei T.T. (2019). Effects of R&D intensity on firm performance in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Economic Research, 32(1): 2377–2392.
12. Crespi G., Zuniga P. (2012). Innovation and productivity: Evidence from six Latin American countries. World Development, 40(2), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.010.
13. Criscuolo C. (2009). Innovation and productivity: Estimating the core model across 18 countries. In: Innovation in firms: A microeconomic perspective. Paris, OECD, 111–138.
14. Crowley F., McCann P. (2018). Firm innovation and productivity in Europe: Evidence from innovation-driven and transition-driven economies. Applied Economics, 50(11): 1203–1221.
15. De Loecker J. (2011). Product differentiation, multiproduct firms, and estimating the impact of trade liberalization on productivity. Econometrica, 79(5): 1407–1451.
16. Doran J. (2012). Are differing forms of innovation complements or substitutes? European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(3): 351–371.
17. Edeh J.N., Acedo F.J. (2021). External supports, innovation efforts and productivity: Estimation of a CDM model for small firms in developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173: 121189.
18. Ehls D., Polier S., Herstatt C. (2020). Reviewing the field of external knowledge search for innovation: Theoretical underpinnings and future (re-)search directions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(5), 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12549.
19. Goedhuys M., Veugelers R. (2012). Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and growth: Firm-level evidence from Brazil. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23: 516–529.
20. Hall B.H. (2011). Innovation and productivity. Cambridge, MA, NBER, working paper 17178.
21. Homburg C., Hohenberg S., Hahn A. (2019). Steering the sales force for new product selling: Why is it different, and How can firms motivate different sales reps? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(3): 282–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12476.
22. Ku C.-F., Chen S.-J., Ho J.-M. (2010). Improving end-to-end communication performance by controlling behavior of intermediate network node. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 6(4): 1893–1903.
23. Malek S., Sarin S., Haon C. (2020). Extrinsic rewards, intrinsic motivation, and new product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(6), 528–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12554.
24. Pantagakis E., Terzakis D., Arvanitis S.Е. (2012). R&D investments and firm performance: An empirical investigation of the high technology sector (software and hardware) in the E.U. Strategy Models for Firm Performance Enhancement eJournal, 21 November: n. pag.
25. Peters B., Riley R., Siedschlag I., Vahter P., McQuinn J. (2018). Internationalisation, innovation and productivity in services: Evidence from Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom. Review of World Economy, 154: 585–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-018-0313-9.
26. Santi C., Santoleri P. (2017). Exploring the link between innovation and growth in Chilean firms. Small Business Economics, 49(2): 445–467.
27. Vithessonthi C., Racela O.C. (2016). Short- and long-run effects of internationalization and R&D intensity on firm performance. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 34: 28–45.
评论
供引用:
Orlovtseva O.M., Gubanova E.V. 产品和流程创新对财务业绩的影响：对俄罗斯公司的实证研究. 战略决策和风险管理. 2023;14(3):278-291. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2023-3-278-291
For citation:
Orlovtseva O.M., Gubanova E.V. THE IMPACT OF PRODUCT AND PROCESS INNOVATIONS ON FINANCIAL RESULTS: АN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF RUSSIAN COMPANIES. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2023;14(3):278-291. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2023-3-278-291
浏览:
516
Email this article 