绘制资源效率与国民经济创新之间的关系图

这篇文章研究了不同国家的创新发展水平与个人资源使用效率之间的关系，以进一步确定未来更多地引进新技术对负责任地处理资源的情况可能产生的影响。为了进行研究，我们形成了两个国家样本：第一个包括36个世界经济体，计算了它们利用能源和劳动力资源的效率指标，并考虑了经济规模和达到的创新水平；第二个样本包含121个国家的物质足迹数据，以及它们的创新和经济发展水平。 经验证实了一个假设，即国家经济的创新水平与资源利用效率之间存在关联。而且，相关分析的结果表明，国家经济的创新水平与自然资源消耗量之间存在着直接密切的关系，可以用线性函数描述，并且证实了随着人民福祉和经济创新水平的增长，政府留下的物质足迹也在增加。 研究的理论和实践意义在于促进基于负责任生产和消费原则的工具提供的创新发展程度的合理性，从而在相同成本下实现更好的结果。未来研究的潜在方向可能包括确定与企业创新活动和资源利用效率相关的必要和充分因素，以及建立所选变量之间的功能关系。对俄罗斯企业经验的详细研究及其对区域创新性和资源利用效率指标的差异化影响也是合乎逻辑的。

1. Косолапова Н.А., Матвеева Л.Г., Никитаева А.Ю., Чернова О.А. (2023). Драйверы формирования циркулярной экономики: теория vs практика. Terra Economicus, 21(2): 68–83. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-2-68-83.

2. Кравченко С.И. (2021). Идентификация национальной инновационной системы в глобализированной среде. Стратегические решения и риск-менеджмент, 12(4): 335–343. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2021-4-335-343.

3. Сальманов С.М. (2023). Роль минерально-сырьевой базы и ее влияние на экономику стран мира. Инновации и инвестиции, 1: 62–66.

4. Трачук А.В., Линдер Н.В. (2021). Ключевые показатели эффективности инновационной деятельности: восприятие значимости и практическое применение. Стратегические решения и риск-менеджмент, 12(4): 284–298. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2021-4-284-298.

5. Трофимова Н.Н. (2022). Ключевые тенденции в реализации целей в области устойчивого развития. Этносорциум, 9(171): 130–136.

6. Bach V., Berger M., Henßler M., Kirchner M., Leiser S., Mohr L., Rother E., Ruhland K., Schneider L., Tikana L., Volkhausen W., Walachowicz F., Finkbeiner M. (2016). Integrated method to assess resource efficiency – ESSENZ. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137: 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.077.

7. Barrett J., Scott K. (2012). Link between climate change mitigation and resource efficiency: A UK case study. Global Environmental Change, 22(1): 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.003.

8. Diaz Lopez F.J., Bastein T., Tukker A. (2019). Business model innovation for resource-efficiency, circularity and cleaner production: What 143 cases tell us. Ecological Economics, 155: 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.009.

9. Dutta S., Lanvin B., Rivera Leon L., Wunsch-Vincent S. (2023). Global innovation index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty. Geneva, World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-2000-2023-en-main-report-global-innovation-index-2023-16th-edition.pdf.

10. Fan L., Wang D. (2024). Natural resource efficiency and green economy: Key takeaways on clean energy, globalization, and innovations in BRICS countries. Resources Policy, 88: 104382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104382.

11. Giljum S., Bruckner M., Martinez A. (2015). Material footprint assessment in a global input-output framework. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(5): 792–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12214.

12. Hamadeh N., Rompaey C., Metreau E. (2024). World Bank Group country classifications by income level for FY 24 (July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024). https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/new-world-bank-group-country-classifications-income-level-fy24.

13. Hatfield-Dodds S., Schandl H., Newth D., Obersteiner M., Cai Y., Baynes T., West J., Havlik P. (2017). Assessing global resource use and greenhouse emissions to 2050, with ambitious resource efficiency and climate mitigation policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 144: 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.170.

14. Matuštík J., Kočí V. (2021). What is a footprint? A conceptual analysis of environmental footprint indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285: 124833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124833.

15. Rahmani A., Aboojafari R., Bonyadi Naeini A., Mashayekh J. (2024). Adoption of digital innovation for resource efficiency and sustainability in the metal industry. Resources Policy, 90: 104719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104719.

16. Singh S., Bhardwaj M., Mahendru M., Bansal P., Roszko-Wójtowicz E. (2024). Exploring economic development and mineral rents nexus across BRICS nations: Fresh insights from multiple threshold panel analysis. Resources Policy, 88: 104537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104537.

17. Sun Y., Gao P., Tian W., Guan W. (2023). Green innovation for resource efficiency and sustainability: Empirical analysis and policy. Resources Policy, 81: 103369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103369.

18. Tang W., Mai L., Li M. (2023). Green innovation and resource efficiency to meet net-zero emission. Resources Policy, 86(B): 104231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104231.

19. Wiedmann T.O., Schandl H., Lenzen M., Moran D., Suh S., West J., Kanemoto K. (2015). The material footprint of nations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112 (20): 6271–6276. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220362110.