Preview

Strategic decisions and risk management

Advanced search

ANALYSIS OF KEY DIRECTIONS AND PROPOSALS TO MINIMISE THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL ENERGY TRANSITION ON LARGE ENERGY-INTENSIVE INDUSTRIAL CONSUMERS OF ELECTRICITY AND CAPACITY

https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2023-2-164-179

Abstract

Over the past decade, the global energy sector has undergone major fundamental and structural changes as part of the global energy transition. The energy industry of the Russian Federation, as a key player in the global energy market and the world economy as a whole, is undergoing similar changes. In this case, in terms of ensuring high competitiveness and long-term energy security of the state, it is crucial to set priorities and build models of sustainable development for each of the industries related to the energy sector. Indeed, the process of replacing carbon-intensive energy sources with a systematic increase in the share of new, renewable energy sources (RES) should be gradual and consistent to avoid imbalances in energy systems and maintain equity for all stakeholders. In this context, the search for advanced, low-carbon energy sources is a priority for the vast majority of countries around the world. In addition, the development of renewable energy is one of the goals of Russia՚s energy strategy until 2035. At the same time, despite the obvious advantages of the Russian power industry such as the absence of dependence on budget funds, the overwhelming majority of private investment in the industry, the availability of effective mechanisms for attracting investment and the basic principle of balancing the interests of all market participants, there are also negative consequences of this approach. The nationwide task of developing the energy system and increasing the availability of electricity on the territory of the Russian Federation in terms of financing is becoming an exclusive burden on electricity consumers themselves; even insignificant risks in their operation can turn into a threat not only to sustainable development, but also to their very existence. In this context, the analysis of key directions and proposals to minimise the economic impact of the global energy transition on large energy-intensive industrial consumers of electricity and capacity is of particular relevance.

About the Author

M. M. Balashov
Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation

Lead advisor, Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia).

Research interests: renewable power, energy efficiency, power industry development in the conditions of the fourth industrial revolution.



References

1. Beloborodov S.S., Gasho E.G., Nenashev A.V. (2021). Renewable energy sources and hydrogen in the power system: Problems and advantages. Saint Petersburg, Naukoemkie tekhnologii, 151. (In Russ.)

2. Daumas L. (2021). Should we be afraid of transition risks - Review of applied literature. French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (FAERE), May: 3-11.

3. Hund K., La Porta D., Fabregas T., Laing T., Drexhage J. (2020). Minerals to combat climate change: The mineral intensity of the transition to clean energy. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 12-14.

4. Kodaneva S.I. (2022). Energy transition: Global trends and their consequences for Russia. Contours of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 1(15): 167-185. (In Russ.)

5. Lee B. (2016). Transformation of our world: Implementation of the 2030 Agenda with the help of indicators of the sustainable development goals. Journal of Public Health Policy, 37: 13-31. DOI: 10.1057/s41271-016-0002-7.

6. Maksimov A. (2020). RES 2.0: A new program for the development of ‘green’ energy in Russia. Energy Policy, 11(153): 22-23. DOI: 10.46920/2409-5516_2020_11153_22. (In Russ.)

7. Marku A. (2021). Mechanism of adjustment of the EU carbon border (CBAM). ERCST, 14: 564.

8. Nallapaneni M., Satish K., Shaurat S. (2020). Operational characteristics of a network solar photovoltaic system integrated into prefabricated portable houses in a warm and temperate climate. Energy for Sustainable Development, 57: 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.05.008.

9. Sologubova G.S., Bogachev V.F., Gorenburgov M.A. (2020). Barriers to financing the renewable energy sector. Global Energy, 4. (In Russ.)

10. Tsakhaeva K.N. (2015). Analysis of the effectiveness of state support for renewable energy sources. Management of Economic Systems, 2(74): 22. (In Russ.)

11. Usacheva I.V., Gladkaya E.A., Landin S.V. (2022). Hybrid energy storage: Problems and prospects of energy storage technologies. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 4(236): 149-167. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Balashov M.M. ANALYSIS OF KEY DIRECTIONS AND PROPOSALS TO MINIMISE THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE GLOBAL ENERGY TRANSITION ON LARGE ENERGY-INTENSIVE INDUSTRIAL CONSUMERS OF ELECTRICITY AND CAPACITY. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2023;14(2):164-179. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2023-2-164-179

Views: 428


ISSN 2618-947X (Print)
ISSN 2618-9984 (Online)