A SINGLE DIGITAL SPACE FOR THE EFFICIENT FUNCTIONING OF INDUSTRY
https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2022-4-376-383
Abstract
The article is devoted to the development of the concept of a single digital space for the effective functioning of the industry. A new model of industrial production organisation, the platform ecosystem are analysed. The analysis of the theoretical concepts of the world economy on its structure, the system of organisation of interaction between ecosystem participants, factors affecting its dynamic development is given. It is shown that digital technologies play an essential role in the organisation of the ecosystem. At the same time, digitalisation occurs in two directions: the creation of the digital space of the enterprise participating in the ecosystem and the creation of the digital space of the ecosystem of industrial production.
The analysis of the use of digital technologies in various industries is given. The rating of the use of digital technologies in industry is discussed. The analysis of the factors constraining the process of digitalisation of the industry of the Russian Federation is given. The concept of ecosystem, presented in the world literature, and its functional and organisational features are analysed.
The influence of institutional conditions on the functional characteristics of the ecosystem is discussed. The ecosystem management system affects the economic and technological efficiency of each ecosystem participant. The prospects for the development of ecosystems based on platforms are shown.
The ability of the Russian manufacturing industry to adapt digital technologies and the organisation of modern forms of production on their basis are analysed. It is demonstrated that the potential of modern production of complex multicomponent products is determined by the ability to scale based on industry 4.0 technologies. At the same time, most of the enterprises fulfill individual orders of consumers and do not participate in the production chains of such products.
The tasks necessary for the organisation of breakthrough development of manufacturing enterprises in Russia are formulated. For modern organisational forms of the manufacturing industry a non-departmental management body is proposed. Its structure and functions are discussed.
About the Authors
Yu. S. BogachevRussian Federation
Doctor of physical and mathematical sciences, chief researcher of the Institute of Financial and Industrial Policy, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia). ORCID: 0000-0002-8595-7674; SPIN-code: 4904-1754; Author ID: 134869.
Research interests: industrial policy, industrial development institutions, innovations of high-tech industrial sectors.
P. V. Trifonov
Russian Federation
References
1. Gudkova T.V. (2021). Trends and problems of digital transformation of enterprises in Russia. In: Topical issues of economics and management: Science and practice. Kriulin readings: A collection of materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Kursk, 133-137. (In Russ.)
2. Korovin G.B. (2019). Social and economic aspects of digitalization in Russia. Journal of Economic Theory, 16(1): 1-11. (In Russ.)
3. Kuzminov Ya.I. (ed.). Russia in a new Era: The choice of priorities and goals of national development (2020). Moscow, Publishing House of the HSE. (In Russ.)
4. Digital transformation in Russia (2020): KMDA Analytical Report. July 14. https://komanda-a.pro/projects/dtr_2020. (In Russ.)
5. Digitalization of the manufacturing industry in 2020: Vectors of digital evolution in the COVID-19 pandemic (2021). Moscow, HSE. (In Russ.)
6. Chepurenko A., Kristalova M., Vyurvikh M. (2019). Historical and institutional aspects of the role of universities in the development. Forsite, 13(4): 48-59. DOI: 10.17323/25002597.2019.4.48.59. (In Russ.)
7. Baldwin C.Y. (2008). Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(1): 155-195. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtm036.
8. Moore J.F. (1993). Predators and prey - A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3): 75-86.
9. Roundy P., Bradshaw M., Brockman B. (2018). The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach. Journal of Business Research, 86: 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.032.
10. Schwab K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. New York, Crown Business.
11. Seiger R., Keller C., Niebling F., Schlegel T. (2014). Modelling complex and flexible processes for smart cyber-physical environments. Journal of Computational Science, 10: 137-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2014.07.001.
12. Teece D. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles. In: Furman J., Gawer A., Silverman B.S., Stern S. (eds.). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and platforms. Advances in Strategic Management, 37: 227-297.
13. Winter S.G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10): 991-995. DOI: 10.1002/smj.318.
Review
For citations:
Bogachev Yu.S., Trifonov P.V. A SINGLE DIGITAL SPACE FOR THE EFFICIENT FUNCTIONING OF INDUSTRY. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2022;13(4):376-383. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2022-4-376-383