IMPLEMENTATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF RAILWAY TRANSPORT HUBS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2022-4-364-375
Abstract
The key tool for economic growth and overcoming restrictions is the implementation of major infrastructure projects in the field of railway transport. Infrastructure projects aimed at organising passenger and freight rail traffic form a wide range of social effects, such as saving travel time, improving transportation safety, reducing emissions of harmful substances and noise levels, increasing physical activity, improving social integration and organising a barrier-free environment, agglomeration effects and an increase in subjective well-being.
At the same time, such projects are very capital-intensive and often cannot be implemented in full due to limited funding. Especially this factor plays a significant role in the current conditions of sanctions pressure. The combination of these factors leads to the need for comprehensive risk management when deciding on the implementation of an infrastructure project for the development of railway junctions.
Thus, the purpose of this study is to identify risks in the implementation of infrastructure projects, assess the identified risks and formulate recommendations for their reduction.
About the Author
P. S. Kuzmin
“TENEX” JSC (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Chief specialist of the Risk Management Department, “TENEX” JSC (Moscow, Russia). SPIN-code: 8042-4060; Author ID: 991705.
Research interests: digital transformation, company development strategy and management, company development strategy formation.
References
1. Vardomsky L.B., Turaeva M.O. (2018). Development of transport corridors of the Post-Soviet space in the context of modern geopolitical and economic challenges (scientific report). Moscow, Institute of Economics RAS. (In Russ.)
2. Vinokurov E.Yu., Lobyrev V.G., Tikhomirov A.A., Tsukarev T.V. (2018a). Transport corridors of the Silk Road: The potential for growth in cargo flows through the EAEU. Report No. 49. St. Petersburg, The Eurasian Development Bank. https://eabr.org/analytics/integration-research/cii-reports/transportnye-koridory-shelkovogo-putipotentsial-rosta-gruzopotokov-cherez-eaes/. (In Russ.)
3. Vinokurov E.Yu., Lobyrev V.G., Tikhomirov A.A., Tsukarev T.V. (2018b). Transport corridors of the Silk Road: Analysis of barriers and recommendations for the direction of investment. Report No. 50. St. Petersburg, The Eurasian Development Bank. https://eabr.org/upload/iblock/304/EDB-Centre_2018_Report-50_Transport-Corridors_Barriers-and-Investments_RUS.pdf. (In Russ.)
4. Ekaterinoslavskij Yu.Yu., Medvedeva A.M., Shchenkov S.A. (2010). Business risks: Diagnostics, prevention, management. Moscow, Ankil, 2010. (In Russ.)
5. Kuznetsova M.O. (2020). Strategic sustainability of industrial companies: Approaches to understanding and risk analysis. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 11(2): 196-205. (In Russ.)
6. Kuzmin P.S. (2020). Possibilities of increasing the competitiveness of rail freight transportation along the transport corridors of the Russian Federation. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 11(2): 160-171. DOI 10.17747/2618-947X-2020-2-160-171. (In Russ.)
7. Linder N.V., Arsenova E.V. (2016). Instruments for stimulating innovative activity of holdings in industry. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 198(2): 266-274. (In Russ.)
8. Linder N.V., Kuznetsova M.O. (2020). Interaction with stakeholders as a factor of increasing the competitiveness of Trans-Eurasian container rail freight along transport corridors: Results of an empirical study. Modern Competition, 14, 3(79): 89-105. (In Russ.)
9. Linder N.V., Litvin I.Y. (2020). Improving the competitiveness of trans-eurasian container rail cargo transportation along transport corridors from the far east to the western border of the Russian Federation. Innovative Development of the Economy, 4-5(58-59): 110-113. (In Russ.)
10. Nalbandyan G.G., Khovalova T.V. (2020). Identification of barriers to the use of digital platforms by SMEs and development of proposals for overcoming them. RISK: Resources, Information, Supply, Competition, 4: 104-108. (In Russ.)
11. Overview of the cargo transportation industry in Russia (2018). EY Company. https://assets.ey.com/content/dam/ey-sites/ey-com/ru_ru/topics/automotive-and-transportation/ey-overview-of-the-cargo-industry-in-russia.pdf. (In Russ.)
12. Evaluation of large infrastructure projects. Tasks and solutions. Developments within the framework of the projects of the Center for Strategic Research (2013). Moscow, Foundation “Center for Strategic Research”. https://www.rzd.ru/api/media/resources/c/1/121/71717?action=download&ysclid=lbgw6i6bcw498247297. (In Russ.)
13. Transport infrastructure and economic growth: Report of Center for Infrastructure Economics (2019). Moscow, Pero. (In Russ.)
14. Trachuk A.V., Linder N.V. (2016). Liquidity limitation influence on industrial companies’ investments in investigations and development and effectiveness of innovative activity. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 1: 80-89. https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2016-1-80-89. (In Russ.)
15. Trachuk A.V., Sayapin A.V. (2014). Practice of forming innovation strategy in Russian companies. Personnel involvement experience. Strategic Decisions and Risk Management, 1: 64-73. https://doi.org/10.17747/2078-8886-2014-1-64-73. (In Russ.)
16. Tsypleva N. (2017). Speed is a Priority. Gudok [Beep], 155(26294), September 6. http://www.gudok.ru/newspaper/?ID=1385773&archive=2017.09.06. (In Russ.)
17. COVID-19. Challenges and their impact on the transport and logistics sector (2020). Roskongress, June 20. (In Russ.)
18. D’Acci L. Monetary, subjective and quantitative approaches to assess urban quality of life and pleasantness in cities (Hedonic price, willingness-to-pay, positional value, life satisfaction, isobenefit lines) (2014). Social Indicators Research, 115: 531-559. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-012-0221-7.
19. Green P.E.J. (2016). Enterprise risk management: A common framework for the entire organization. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann.
20. Value of rail: The contribution of rail in Australia: A report commissioned by the Australasian Railway Association (ARA) (2017). Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, November.
Review
For citations:
Kuzmin P.S. IMPLEMENTATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF RAILWAY TRANSPORT HUBS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2022;13(4):364-375. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2022-4-364-375
Views:
1408
Email this article 