В ПОИСКАХ СОВЕРШЕНСТВА В УПРАВЛЕНИИ СОЦИАЛЬНО-ПРЕДПРИНИМАТЕЛЬСКИМИ ПРОЕКТАМИ: ОПЫТ И СТАНДАРТЫ ЕВРОПЕЙСКОГО CОЮЗА
https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2021-1-92-101
摘要
Развитие социального предпринимательства потребовало новых эффективных управленческих подходов и инструментов. Авторы обращаются к европейскому опыту и стандартам в области управления проектами с целью разработки методологического подхода к организации управления проектами для достижения выдающихся результатов в проектах социального предпринимательства.
В статье представлены результаты квазиэксперимента, цель которого – выявление различий в достигаемых результатах проектов, применяющих европейскую методологию PM2, и проектов, выполненных в рамках методологии PMI. Для оценки результатов проектов использовалась авторская методика, разработанная на основе европейской модели EFQM.
Значимого различия в интегральной оценке результатов проектов в экспериментальной и контрольной группах не обнаружено, что свидетельствует о важности применения методологии управления проектами вне зависимости от ее происхождения. При помощи кластеризации результатов проектов было установлено, что проекты, адаптировавшие европейскую методологию, в большей степени сосредоточены на стратегическом развитии и интеграции в экосистему на принципах долгосрочного сотрудничества, в то время как проекты контрольной группы больше внимания уделяли эффективной организации и координации процессов, ресурсов и взаимодействия.
关于作者
И. Катунина
ФГБОУ ВО «Омский государственный университет им. Ф.М. Достоевского»
俄罗斯联邦
俄罗斯联邦
Ю. Фомина
ФГБОУ ВО «Омский государственный университет им. Ф.М. Достоевского»
俄罗斯联邦
俄罗斯联邦
参考
1. Alberti F.G., Varon Garrido M.A. (2017). Can profit and sustainability goals co-exist? New business models for hybrid firms. Journal of Business Strategy, 38(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-12-2015-0124.
2. Austin J., Stevenson H., Wei-Skillern J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x.
3. Bou-Llusar J.C., Escrig-Tena A.B., Roca-Puig V., Beltrán-Martín I. (2009). An empirical assessment of the EFQM excellence model: Evaluation as a TQM framework relative to the MBNQA model. Journal of Operations Management, 27(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2008.04.001.
4. Boulter L., Bendell T., Dahlgaard J. (2013). Total quality beyond North America: A comparative analysis of the performance of European Excellence Award winners. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 33(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571311295635.
5. Brady T., Davies A. (2004). Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1601-1621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604048002.
6. Calvo-Mora A., Domínguez-CC M., Criado F. (2018). Assessment and improvement of organisational social impact through the EFQM excellence model. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 29(11-12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1253465.
7. Calvo-Mora A., Navarro-García A., Periañez-Cristobal R. (2015). Project to improve knowledge management and key business results through the EFQM excellence model. International Journal of Project Management, 33(8), 1638-1651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.010.
8. Crawford L. (2006). Developing organizational project management capability: Theory and practice. Project Management Journal, 37(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700308.
9. Daniel J., Naderpour M., Lin C.T. (2019). A fuzzy multilayer assessment method for EFQM. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2874019.
10. Dees J.G., Anderson B.B. (2017). Sector-bending: Blurring the lines between nonprofit and for-profit. In: Search of the nonprofit sector. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788813-6.
11. Doherty B., Haugh H., Lyon F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12028.
12. Escrig-Tena A.B., Garcia-Juan B., Segarra-Ciprés M. (2019). Drivers and internalisation of the EFQM excellence model. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 36(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-08-2017-0161.
13. Ethiraj S.K., Kale P., Krishnan M.S., Singh J.V. (2005). Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management Journal, 26(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.433.
14. Görög M. (2016). A broader approach to organisational project management maturity assessment. International Journal of Project Management, 34(8), 1658-1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.011.
15. Grant K.P., Pennypacker J.S. (2006). Project management maturity: An assessment of project management capabilities among and between selected industries. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2005.861802.
16. Kanji G.K. (2002). Business excellence: Make it happen. Total Quality Management, 13(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09544120200000007.
17. Laihonen H. (2015). Performance improvement in twenty-first century organizations: Models, tools, techniques. Measuring Business Excellence, 19(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-06-2015-0032.
18. Lannon J. (2019). Project management performance assessment in the non-profit sector. Project Management Research and Practice, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5130/pmrp.v5i0.5910.
19. Mair J., Noboa E. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: How intentions to create a social enterprise get formed. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.462283.
20. Malsch F., Guieu G. (2019). How to get more with less? Scarce resources and high social ambition: Effectuation as KM tool in social entrepreneurial projects. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0745.
21. McClory S., Read M., Labib A. (2017). Conceptualising the lessons-learned process in project management: Towards a triple-loop learning framework. International Journal of Project Management, 35(7), 1322-1335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.006.
22. McGrath S., Whitty S.J. (2020). Practitioner views on project management methodology (PMM) effectiveness. Journal of Modern Project Management, 8(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM02310.
23. McMullen J.S. (2011). Delineating the domain of development entrepreneurship: A market-based approach to facilitating inclusive economic growth. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00428.x.
24. Mir F.A., Pinnington A.H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: Linking project management performance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.012.
25. Morales A., Calvo S., Guaita Martínez J.M., Martín Martín J.M. (2021). Hybrid forms of business: Understanding the development of indigenous social entrepreneurship practices. Journal of Business Research, 124, 212-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.060.
26. Muñoz P., Kimmitt J. (2019). Social mission as competitive advantage: A configurational analysis of the strategic conditions of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 101, 854-861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.044.
27. Musawir A. ul, Serra C.E.M., Zwikael O., Ali I. (2017). Project governance, benefit management, and project success: Towards a framework for supporting organizational strategy implementation. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1658-1672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.007.
28. Pache A.C., Santos F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405.
29. Padalkar M., Gopinath S. (2016). Six decades of project management research: Thematic trends and future opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 34(7), 1305-1321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.006.
30. Peters T.J., Waterman R.H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. HarperCollins.
31. Pollack J., Adler D. (2016). Skills that improve profitability: The relationship between project management, IT skills, and small to medium enterprise profitability. International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), 831-838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.03.004.
32. Scheiblich M., Maftei M., Just V., Studeny M. (2017). Developing a project scorecard to measure the performance of project management in relation to EFQM excellence model. Amfiteatru Economic, 19 (spec. iss. 11).
33. Söderlund J. (2005). Developing project competence: Empirical regularities in competitive project operations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 09(04). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919605001344.
34. Stecker M.J. (2014). Revolutionizing the nonprofit sector through social entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624480208.
35. The PM2 project management methodology guide 3.0. (2018). In: Project management methodology. Publications Office of the European Union. URL: https://doi.org/10.1201/b16834.
36. Toma S.-G., Marinescu P. (2018). Business excellence models: A comparison. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 12(1), 966-974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2018-0086.
37. Tracey P., Phillips N., Jarvis O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0522.
38. Turner J.R., Xue Y. (2018). On the success of megaprojects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2017-0062.
评论
供引用:
Katunina I.V., Fomina Yu.A. IN SEARCH OF EXCELLENCE IN SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROJECT MANAGEMENT: EXPERIENCE AND STANDARDS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2021;12(1):92-101. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2021-1-92-101
浏览:
2581
Email this article 