Preview

Strategic decisions and risk management

Advanced search

Periodization of Corporate Entrepreneurship Research

https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2026-2-211-220

Abstract

Corporate entrepreneurship (CE) has evolved from a peripheral topic in organization studies into a distinct research field that integrates perspectives from strategic management, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. Despite five decades of research, the field remains terminologically fragmented and lacks a theoretically grounded periodization. This article addresses this gap. Drawing on Lakatos's methodology of scientific research programs and Whitley's concept of the intellectual organization of the sciences, it proposes a four-phase periodization: emergence and conceptual formation (1970s–early 1980s); terminological debates and operationalization (mid-1980s–1990s); strategic consolidation (2000s); and institutionalization and contextualization (2010s–present). Each phase is characterized by its hard core of assumptions, central research question, key studies, and the factors that prompted the transition to the next phase. The periodization explains not only the chronology but also the logic of successive research programs: why the field debated definitions for so long, why strategic entrepreneurship gained traction rapidly, and why the current phase focuses on context. The article advances three arguments: transitions between phases were not gradual but involved shifts in the field’s basic assumptions; the field systematically borrows theories from adjacent disciplines while rarely tests their applicability beyond their original contexts; and the central task of the current phase is not to broaden the geographic scope of research but to reconsider the theoretical constructs themselves, whose embedded assumptions were shaped primarily by the American institutional context and are not universally applicable. The article concludes by outlining directions for future research on corporate entrepreneurship in state-owned enterprises and extractive industries, taking institutional and industry-specific characteristics into account.

About the Author

K. V. Nanieva
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation

Postgraduate Student, Department of Management, Marketing, and Foreign Economic Activity, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University), Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russia). ORCID: 0009-0001-5874-9773. Research interests: corporate entrepreneurship, strategic management, innovation management, institutional conditions of firm development.



References

1. Shirokova G.V., Sarycheva V.A., Blagov E.Yu., Kulikov A.V. (2009). Intra-Company Entrepreneurship: Approaches to the Study of the Phenomenon. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series: Management, (1): 3-31. (In Russ.)

2. Shirokova G.V., Sokolova L.S. (2013). Formation of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Russian Small and Medium-Sized Businesses: The Role of the Institutional Environment. Russian Journal of Management, 11(2): 25-50. (In Russ.)

3. Barney J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.

4. Birkinshaw J. (1997). Entrepreneurship in Multinational Corporations: The Characteristics of Subsidiary Initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3): 207-229.

5. Bruton G.D., Ahlstrom D., Li H.L. (2010). Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Need to Move in the Future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3): 421-440.

6. Bruton G.D., Peng M.W., Ahlstrom D., Stan C., Xu K. (2015). State-Owned Enterprises around the World as Hybrid Organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1): 92-114.

7. Burgelman R.A. (1983). A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2): 223-244.

8. Chandler A.D. (1977). The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

9. Corbett A., Covin J.G., O’Connor G.C., Tucci C.L. (2013). Corporate Entrepreneurship: State-of-the-Art Research and a Future Research Agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5): 812-820.

10. Covin J.G., Slevin D.P. (1989). Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1): 75-87.

11. Floyd S.W., Wooldridge B. (1992). Middle Management Involvement in Strategy and Its Association with Strategic Type. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1): 153-167.

12. Girma Aragaw Z., Haag K., Baù M. (2025). Contextualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 37(1-2): 1-37.

13. Glinyanova M., Bouncken R.B., Tiberius V., Cuenca Ballester A.C. (2021). Five Decades of Corporate Entrepreneurship Research: Measuring and Mapping the Field. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(4): 1731-1757.

14. Guth W.D., Ginsberg A. (1990). Guest Editors’ Introduction: Corporate Entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11(Summer Special Issue): 5-15.

15. Ireland R.D., Covin J.G., Kuratko D.F. (2009). Conceptualizing Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1): 19-46.

16. Ireland R.D., Hitt M.A., Sirmon D.G. (2003). A Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(6): 963-989.

17. Kuratko D.F. (2017). Corporate Entrepreneurship 2.0: Research Development and Future Directions. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 13(6): 441-490.

18. Kuratko D.F., Hornsby J.S., Covin J.G. (2014). Diagnosing a Firm’s Internal Environment for Corporate Entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 57(1): 37-47.

19. Lakatos I. (1970). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In: Lakatos I., Musgrave A. (eds.). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 91-196.

20. Musacchio A., Lazzarini S.G. (2014). Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

21. Nambisan S. (2017). Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6): 1029-1055.

22. Peterson R.A., Berger D.G. (1971). Entrepreneurship in Organizations: Evidence from the Popular Music Industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(1): 97-106.

23. Pinchot G. (1985). Intrapreneuring: Why You Don’t Have to Leave the Corporation to Become an Entrepreneur. New York, Harper & Row.

24. Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.

25. Urbano D., Turro A., Wright M., Zahra S. (2022). Corporate Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Small Business Economics, 59(4): 1541-1565.

26. Weiblen T., Chesbrough H.W. (2015). Engaging with Startups to Enhance Corporate Innovation. California Management Review, 57(2): 66-90.

27. Welter F. (2011). Contextualizing Entrepreneurship - Conceptual Challenges and Ways Forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1): 165-184.

28. Whitley R. (2000). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

29. Zahra S.A. (1991). Predictors and Financial Outcomes of Corporate Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4): 259-285.


Review

For citations:


Nanieva K.V. Periodization of Corporate Entrepreneurship Research. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2026;17(2):211-220. https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2026-2-211-220



ISSN 2618-947X (Print)
ISSN 2618-9984 (Online)