制度框架内小型企业类型：提高效率影响

俄罗斯联邦《中小企业发展法》中存在小微企业治理目标矛盾问题。 为化解这一矛盾，需深入研究小微企业制度性监管的核心特征。本文的研究意义在于从资源导向视角出发，为小型风险企业多样性分类寻找科学依据标准。根据Scopus文献计量分析结果，确定了一个双重标准：小型企业的经济可持续性取决于其资源专业化程度；而资源专业化水平又显著影响外部制度干预的可能性。 内容分析显示，现行市场规制体系尚不足以实现小型风险企业的发展目标。 实践结论表明，若要使小型风险企业成为国家-制度性产业政策的重点扶持对象，必须根据其资源专业化程度对其进行分类。

1. Ahuja G., Capron L., Lenox M., Yaod D.A. (2018). Strategy and the Institutional Envelope. Strategy Science, 3(2). DOI: 10.1287/stsc.2018.0062.

2. Barney J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17018-4.

3. Bogatyreva K., Laskovaia A., Osiyevskyy O. (2022). Entrepreneurial activity, intrapreneurship, and conducive institutions: Is there a connection? Journal of Business Research, 146: 45-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.062.

4. De Massis A., Audretsch D., Uhlaner L. Kammerlander N. (2017). Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1): 125-46.

5. DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.

6. Eckhardt J.T., Ciuchta M.P. Carpenter M. (2018). Open innovation, information, and entrepreneurship within platform ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(3): 369-391.

7. Eesley C.E., Eberhart R.N., Skousen B.R., Cheng J.L.C. (2018). Institutions and entrepreneurial activity: The interactive influence of misaligned formal and informal institutions. Strategy Sciences, 3(2): 393-407.

8. Guo H., Wang C., Su Z., Wang D. (2020). Technology push or market pull. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(4): 352-372. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12526.

9. Kondra A.Z., Hurst D.C. (2009). Institutional processes of organizational culture. Culture and Organization, 15(1): 39-58.

10. Kraaijenbrink J., Spender J.-C., Groen A.J. (2010). The Resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. Review. Journal of Management, 36(1): 349-372. DOI: 10.1177/0149206309350775.

11. Lin Y., Wu L.-Y. (2014). Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework. Journal of Business Research, 67(3): 407-413. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.019.

12. Loon M., Chik R. (2019). Efficiency-centered, innovation-enabling business models of high-tech SMEs: Evidence from Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(1): 87-111.

13. McDonald R.M., Eisenhardt K.M. (2020). Parallel play: Startups, nascent markets, and effective business-model design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(2): 483-523. DOI: 10.1177/00018 39219 852349.

14. Oberholzer-Gee F., Yao D.A. (2018). Integrated strategy: Residual market and exchange imperfections as the foundation of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategy Sciences, 3(2): 463-480.

15. Oliver C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16: 145-179.

16. Prahalad C.K., Hamel G. (1994). Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new paradigm? Strategic Management Journal, summer special issue (15): 5-16.

17. Prahalad C.K., Ramaswamy V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Review. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3): 5-14.

18. Snihur Y., Zott C. (2020). The genesis and metamorphosis of novelty imprints: How business model innovation emerges in young ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2): 554-583. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2017.0706.

19. Teece D.J. (2018). Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(3): 359-368. DOI: 10.1017/jmo.2017.75.

20. Waguespack D.M., Dunford E.T., Birnir J.K. (2018). Cultural imprinting, institutions, and the organization of new firms. Strategy Sciences, 3(2): 426-438.

21. Wernerfelt B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-180. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250050207.