创新与知识管理的关系:基于知识的创新的原理与分类
https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2025-1-35-46
摘要
文章致力于研究知识在创新过程中的作用,认为知识创造是成功创新的关键因素。现代经济条件强调了知识作为创造独特竞争优势的关键资源的重要性。 本文探讨了创新与知识创造过程之间的关系,而知识创造过程往往被忽视或低估。文中介绍了对创新和知识创造模式进行定义和分类的不同方法,包括作者基于知识创造和创新创造对创新进行分类的方法。 已形成的基于知识的创新分类包括知识的三个方面:根据新颖程度划分的知识类型(全新知识或使用现有知识)、知识创造(市场知识或经验)、知识特征(显性或隐性)。对以知识为基础的创新进行的实证研究,通过引入创新创造的知识来源信息作为公司管理者的一个重要特征,对所提出的分类方法进行了补充。结论是,创造和整合知识对于成功创新非常重要。
关于作者
Н. Линдер俄罗斯联邦
经济学博士、教授、战略与创新发展系教授, 高等管理学院, 俄罗斯联邦政府国立财政金融大学(俄罗斯,莫斯科); ‘Goznak’有限公司的营销部负责人(俄罗斯,莫斯科). ORCID: 0000-0002-4724-2344.
科学兴趣领域: 公司发展战略与管理、第四次工业革命条件下工业公司发展战略的制定、商业模式的创新与转型、电子商务的动态与发展、第四次工业革命条件下能源行业公司的发展战略、俄罗斯公司进入国际市场的战略。
П. Сережин
俄罗斯联邦
经理(俄罗斯,莫斯科)。
科学兴趣领域: 创新的引入及其对公司业绩的影响、中小型企业的活动、以知识为基础的创新、创新类型、组织中的知识管理。
参考
1. Линдер Н.В. (2021). Трансформация инновационного поведения российских промышленных предприятий в условиях четвертой промышленной революции: дис. … д.э.н. Москва, Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации.
2. Abernathy W.J., Clark K.B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1): 3–22.
3. Afuah A. (2023). Redefining firm boundaries in the face of the internet: Аre firms really shrinking? Academy of Management Review, 28(1): 34–53.
4. Ahlskog M., Bruch J., Jackson M. (2017). Knowledge integration in manufacturing technology development. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 28(8): 1035–1054.
5. Botega L.F.D.C., Da Silva J.C. (2020). An artificial intelligence approach to support knowledge management on the selection of creativity and innovation techniques. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(5): 1107–1130.
6. Chandy R.K., Tellis G.J. (1998). Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4): 474–487.
7. Dewar R.D., Dutton J.E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11): 1422–1433.
8. Drucker P.F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York, Harper & Row Publishers.
9. Fischer G. (2001). Communities of interest: Learning through the interaction of multiple knowledge systems. In: Proceedings of the 24th IRIS Conference. Bergen, Department of Information Science, 1: 1–13.
10. Frascati Manual (2015). A summary of the Frascati manual. Main definitions and conventions for the measurement of research and experimental development (R&D). OCDE/GD(94)84. http://www.oecd.org/document/6/0,2340,en_2649_34451_33828550_1_1_1_1,00.html.
11. Garcia R., Calantone R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: А literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management: 19(2): 110–132.
12. Hagedorn T.J., Krishnamurty S., Grosse I.R. (2018). A knowledge-based method for innovative design for additive manufacturing supported by modular ontologies. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 18(2): 021009.
13. Henderson R.M., Clark K.B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 9–30.
14. Liu Q., Wang K., Li Y., Chen C., Li W. (2022). A novel function-structure concept network construction and analysis method for a smart product design system. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 51: 101502.
15. Liu Q., Zhang J., Fang P., Shi Q., Liu X., Li D. (2025). Knowledge management for product innovation design based on dual-layer concept network. International Journal of Modern Physics, C: 2442010.
16. McDermott C.M., O’Connor G.C. (2002). Managing radical innovation: An overview of emergent strategy issues. Journal of Product Innovation Management: 19(6): 424–438.
17. Nonaka I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1): 14–37.
18. Nonaka I., Nishiguchi T. (2001). Knowledge emergence: Social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
19. Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. (1995).The knowledge-creating company. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
20. Oslo Manual (2018). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. European Commission. http://www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/35/61/2367580.pdf.
21. Pedersen C.Ø., Dalum B. (2004). Incremental versus radical change – The case of the digital North Denmark program. Paper presented at 10th International Schumpeter Society Conference 2004, 9–12 Juni. Milano, Bocconi University.
22. Polanyi M. (1967). Sense-giving and sense-reading. Philosophy, 42(162): 301–325.
23. Porter, M. E. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Strategy, 5(3) 60–78.
24. Rogers E.M., Williams D. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. Glencoe, IL, The Free Press.
25. Tushman M.L., Anderson, P., & O’Reilly, C. (1997). Technology cycles innovation streams and ambidextrous organisations. In: Managing strategic innovation and change: A collection of readings. New York, Oxford University Press.
26. Urabe K. (1988). Innovation and the Japanese management system. In: Urabe K., Child J., Kagono T. (eds.). Innovation and management international comparisons. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.
27. Utterback J.M. (1994). One point of view: Radical innovation and corporate regeneration. Research-Technology Management, 37(4): 10.
28. Yang J., Quan H., Zeng Y. (2022). Knowledge: The good, the bad, and the ways for designer creativity. Journal of Engineering Design, 33(12): 945–968.
29. Zack M. (1998). What knowledge-problems can information technology help to solve? AMCIS 1998 Proceedings, 216.
30. Zhang C., Kordestani H., Shadabfar M. (2023). A combined review of vibration control strategies for high-speed trains and railway infrastructures: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 42(1): 272–291
评论
供引用:
, 创新与知识管理的关系:基于知识的创新的原理与分类. 战略决策和风险管理. 2025;16(1):35-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2025-1-35-46
For citation:
Linder N.V., Serezhin P.D. The interrelation between innovations and knowledge management systems: Justification and classification of knowledge-based innovations. Strategic decisions and risk management. 2025;16(1):35-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2025-1-35-46