<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ecr</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Strategic decisions and risk management</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Стратегические решения и риск-менеджмент</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2618-947X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2618-9984</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Real Economy Publishing House</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17747/2618-947X-2021-2-178-183</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">ecr-948</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT ON THE ENTERPRISE TO REALIZE GREEN DEVELOPMENT</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>УПРАВЛЕНИЕ ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКИМИ РИСКАМИ ПРЕДПРИЯТИЙ В ЦЕЛЯХ РЕАЛИЗАЦИИ СТРАТЕГИИ ЗЕЛЕНОГО РАЗВИТИЯ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шаньи</surname><given-names>Ч.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shanyi</surname><given-names>Ch.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Graduate student, Southern Federal University (Rostov-on-Don, Russia). Research interests: environmental management, sustainable development, green manufacturing, green regional economy, government environmental regulation.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Graduate student, Southern Federal University (Rostov-on-Don, Russia). Research interests: environmental management, sustainable development, green manufacturing, green regional economy, government environmental regulation.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">8632015@qq.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9190-8919</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мурзин</surname><given-names>А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Murzin</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Аssociate professor, Southern Federal University, Don State Technical University (Rostov-on-Don, Russia). ORCID 0000-0001-9190-8919, Researcher ID F-6037-2014, SPIN 5019-8260, AuthorID 389884. Research interests: risk management, sustainable development, territorial development, modeling, management.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Аssociate professor, Southern Federal University, Don State Technical University (Rostov-on-Don, Russia). ORCID 0000-0001-9190-8919, Researcher ID F-6037-2014, SPIN 5019-8260, AuthorID 389884. Research interests: risk management, sustainable development, territorial development, modeling, management.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">admurzin@sfedu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Южный федеральный университет (Ростов-на-Дону, Россия)</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Southern Federal University (Rostov-on-Don, Russia)</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Южный федеральный университет (Ростов-на-Дону, Россия), Донской государственный технический университет (Ростов-на-Дону, Россия)</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Southern Federal University (Rostov-on-Don, Russia), Don State Technical University (Rostov-on-Don, Russia)</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>12</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>178</fpage><lpage>183</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Shanyi C., Murzin A., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Шаньи Ч., Мурзин А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Shanyi C., Murzin A.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.jsdrm.ru/jour/article/view/948">https://www.jsdrm.ru/jour/article/view/948</self-uri><abstract><p>The environmental risk of an enterprise refers to the impact on the environment and possibility of accidents. In recent decades, the emerging industrial economies represented by BRICS countries have developed rapidly, which has inevitably led to increased pollution and deterioration of environmental quality in these countries. This chapter describes China, which has the fastest economic development among BRICS countries, as an example, and summarizes some evaluation and performance indicators of corporate environmental risk management, so as to facilitate the construction of a scientific and reasonable evaluation indicator system in our further research. The concluding paragraph briefly introduces several measures to reduce the environmental risks of industrial enterprises.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Экологический риск предприятия включает аспекты воздействия и возможный ущерб окружающей среде. Последние десятилетия индустриально развитые страны, к которым относятся страны БРИКC, продолжали стремительный промышленный рост, что неизбежно привело к увеличению загрязнения и снижению качества окружающей среды. В настоящей статье в качестве примера рассматривается Китай, экономическое развитие которого характеризуется наибольшими темпами среди стран БРИКC. Также обобщаются некоторые оценочные индикаторы и критерии эффективности корпоративного управления экологическими рисками. Это позволит представить научное обоснование системы оценочных индикаторов. В заключение кратко описаны некоторые меры по снижению экологических рисков промышленных предприятий.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>экологический риск</kwd><kwd>управление экологическими рисками</kwd><kwd>оценка экологических рисков</kwd><kwd>устойчивое развитие предприятий</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>еnvironmental risk</kwd><kwd>environmental risk management</kwd><kwd>environmental risk assessment</kwd><kwd>sustainable development of enterprises</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><p>The green development of an enterprise is of great significance for sustainable development, and the environmental risk of an enterprise is the key problem of green development. The environmental risk of an enterprise refers to the impact on the environment and possibility of accidents. Among the potential threats for the environment are emissions, wastes, and resource depletion generated during the production process. In recent decades, the rapid development of newly industrialized countries represented by BRICS countries has inevitably led to increased pollution and deterioration of environmental quality in related countries. There are more and more studies of the environmental risks on enterprises, especially industrial enterprises. In 2014, the GDP of BRICS countries accounted for 21.85% of the total global GDP, while carbon dioxide emissions accounted for 42.21% of the total global emissions. Global carbon project statistics shows that in 2016, Russia ranked fourth, Brazil and South Africa took twelfth and thirteenth place respectively [Xinjing, Baohua, 2018; National environmental protection.., 2019].</p><p>China’s carbon emissions rank first in the world while India ranks third, indicating that there is still a lot of room for industrial environmental improvement. China’s total environmental protection investment is continuously increasing, and its share of GDP has gradually stabilized by about 1.4%. During the tenth five-year plan period, the proportion was 1.16%, and during the twelfth five-year plan period, the proportion rose by 1.43%. Judging from the current international experience, environmental protection investment accounted for 1-1.5% of the country (region)’s total economy that year, indicating that the country (region) was only at the stage of basic control of environmental pollution. China’s environmental governance goal is to improve environmental quality, that is, the proportion should reach 2-3%. It can be seen that the scale of China’s environmental protection investments still needs further expansion. This article describes China, which has the fastest economic growth and the highest pollution rate among BRICS countries. As an example, it has to introduce the concepts of industrial enterprise environmental risk, enterprise environmental management, and enterprise environmental regulation [Jingshuai, 2020; Yanxia, 2020].</p><p>The concept of environmental risks has been mentioned earlier. Among them are different types of pollution risks: air pollution risk, water pollution risk, solid waste pollution risk, noise pollution risk, radiation pollution risk, and others. Air pollution is the most serious in various energy companies, especially thermal power and steel. Water pollution is the most serious in such industries as paper manufacturing, metal smelting, and chemicals. Several other major aspects of pollution are related to various industrial enterprises. Among them, thermal power, iron and steel, paper manufacturing, metal smelting, and chemical industries have several pollution characteristics at the same time and cause greater serious damage to the environment and the highest environmental risk.</p><p>Scholars have also conducted a research taking into account the idea of “environmental risk management → changes in enterprise production factors → enterprise competitiveness”. They believe that environmental risk management has an impact on industrial economy and enterprise production not only at the macro, but also at the micro level.</p><p>The research on corporate environmental risk can be divided into several aspects. The research lines of Chinese scholars mostly follow those of European and American scholars. Some start with environmental risk management, others - with environmental risk assessment. Strategy management is also taken into account. In terms of environmental risk management, Chinese scholars mostly use various industries for their research. China’s industrial system is complete, and all major industries can find actual objects for research in China. According to the current pollution data in China, scholars mainly focus on thermal power, energy, chemical and heavy manufacturing. It is necessary to study the management of the enterprise itself, the environmental responsibility of the management of industrial parks, and the environmental management functions of the government. Most studies are based on China’s actual national conditions and can propose targeted solutions to practical problems.</p><p>This chapter considers several aspects that can partially solve or reduce the environmental risks of industrial enterprises, but the academic circles have not yet come to a conclusion how to eliminate environmental risks. Taking BRICS countries as an example, their attitudes towards environmental risks of industrial enterprises are not the same as well. In case of China there are currently two major schools in the academic community studying corporate environmental management and environmental risk assessment: one studies natural sciences and conducts general research on environmental risk assessment. The questions of technological development and utilization, environmental pollution and prevention technology, clean production technology, etc. are discussed at the engineering and technical level. The second school is interested in social sciences, management (including accounting and auditing), economics, and law. Corporate environmental pollution and protection issues, such as corporate environmental management, economic evaluation of external environmental damage, accounting confirmation and measurement of related environmental matters, environmental auditing, environmental legislation, etc. [Pigou, 1932; Coase, 1960; Man, 2005; Xu, Zhifang, 2012] are the scope of its research.</p><p>This article attempts to demonstrate the problem from the aspects of management innovation as well as the perspective of technological innovation in environmental risk management.</p><p> </p><p>Enterprise’s response function to environmental risk management. Whether an enterprise conducts environmental management policy, the improvement of environmental management is the result of correlated internal and external factors. The environmental management decision of the enterprise can be described by the enterprise’s environmental management reaction function. According to the analysis it can be seen that the external factors affecting corporate environmental management can be divided into two categories: government risk management factors and market factors. Management decisions have a key impact. Therefore, the environmental management decision of an enterprise can be described as the following environmental reaction function (ERF):</p><p>ERF = f(External factors, internal factors).</p><p>The specific content of external and internal factors in the environmental response function is presented in table 2:</p><p>Different influencing factors in independent variables will have different effects on the company’s environmental management decisions: For some companies, environmental risk management is the main factor that affects the company’s environmental management decisions, while for other companies, it comes from the pressure of competitors, the environmental management of upstream and downstream enterprises. The environmental pressure of residents in the district are the main factors that affect the environmental management decisions of enterprises. Among the various influencing factors presented in Table 2, the government environmental risk management is the most basic one. Since the environment has the characteristics of public good, it is difficult to imagine that enterprises will consciously carry out environmental management policy without environmental risk management as the basic point. Therefore, the reaction function of enterprise environmental management can also be called the reaction function of enterprise to environmental risk management, and other influencing factors are derived on the basis of environmental risk management.</p><table-wrap id="table-1"><caption><p>Table 1</p><p>Carbon emission efficiency of BRICS countries from 2010 to 2016</p><p>Таблица 1</p><p>Эффективность выбросов углерода в странах БРИКС, 2010–2016 годы</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Country</td><td>Year</td><td>7-year average growth %</td></tr><tr><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td>2012</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>Brazil</td><td>6.67</td><td>6.67</td><td>6.25</td><td>6.25</td><td>5.88</td><td>5.56</td><td>5.88</td><td>-11.77</td></tr><tr><td>Russia</td><td>1.75</td><td>1.79</td><td>1.82</td><td>1.92</td><td>1.92</td><td>1.89</td><td>1.92</td><td>9.62</td></tr><tr><td>India</td><td>3.13</td><td>3.13</td><td>2.94</td><td>3.13</td><td>3.13</td><td>3.23</td><td>3.23</td><td>3.23</td></tr><tr><td>China</td><td>1.41</td><td>1.39</td><td>1.45</td><td>1.54</td><td>1.64</td><td>1.79</td><td>1.89</td><td>33.96</td></tr><tr><td>South Africa</td><td>1.27</td><td>1.52</td><td>1.35</td><td>1.39</td><td>1.35</td><td>1.45</td><td>1.43</td><td>12.86</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table-2"><caption><p>Table 2</p><p>Analysis of influencing factors of environmental risk management response function</p><p>Таблица 2</p><p>Анализ факторов влияния в функции реагирования управления экологическими рисками</p></caption><table><tbody><tr><td>Dependent variable</td><td>Industrial environmental management decision (necessity to conduct environmental management and the depth of environmental management)</td></tr><tr><td>Independent variable</td><td>Type</td><td>Specific influencing factors</td><td>Factor analysis</td></tr><tr><td>External factors</td><td>Specific impact on environmental risk management</td><td>Different types of environmental risk management, implementation status (indirectly dependent on economic development status), and degree of strictness of environmental risk management</td></tr><tr><td>Market environment</td><td>The market structure, the degree of monopoly and competition, the position of the company in the production chain</td></tr><tr><td>Social factors</td><td>Social environmental awareness, environmental pressure from customers and residents</td></tr><tr><td>Competitor behavior</td><td>Relationship with competitors (whether competition or conspiracy exist)</td></tr><tr><td>Internal factors</td><td>Enterprise technology status</td><td>Enterprise’s production function, factor constraints, pollution control technology</td></tr><tr><td>Corporate strategic positioning</td><td>Long-term vision is still necessary for quick success, based on domestic or international markets</td></tr><tr><td>Management factor</td><td>Manager’s ability, environmental awareness, etc.</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Environmental risk management is a necessary prerequisite for modern enterprises to achieve sustainable development. The goal of scientific environmental risk management is to achieve ecological and green sustainable development of the manufacturing industry, which is in line with the basic trend of current global development. In the actual management link, the staff needs to take into account the local common natural disasters and the data about environmental quality status, sort out environmental problems, estimate possible hazards, and formulate corresponding prevention plans [Dongning, Changhui, 2005].</p><p>Since environmental risk management is beneficial to the development of the industrial economy or it restricting the development of the industrial economy, the solution to this problem is the key to the government and various industrial departments formulating and implementing specific environmental risk management measures. To explain the practical effect of environmental risk management on China’s industrial economic growth, and to propose what environmental risk management policies must be adhered to in order to achieve a win-win situation for environmental protection and industrial economic growth are of key importance. The implementation of environmental risk management needs to be based on the status quo of regional development to ensure that environmental risk management is as small as possible to inhibit industrial economic growth. The research in this article still lacks empirical approach, which will be further proved by combining relevant models.</p></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Angang H. (2008). The provincial technical efficiency ranking considering environmental factors (1999-2005). The Quarterly of Economics, 3: 933-960.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Angang H. (2008). The provincial technical efficiency ranking considering environmental factors (1999-2005). The Quarterly of Economics, 3: 933-960.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bing W., Yanrui W., Pengfei Y. (2008). Environmental regulation and total factor productivity growth: An empirical study of APEC. Economic Research, 5: 19-32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bing W., Yanrui W., Pengfei Y. (2008). Environmental regulation and total factor productivity growth: An empirical study of APEC. Economic Research, 5: 19-32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bing W., Yanrui W., Pengfei Y. (2010). China’s regional environmental efficiency and environmental total factor productivity growth. Economic Research, 5: 95-109.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bing W., Yanrui W., Pengfei Y. (2010). China’s regional environmental efficiency and environmental total factor productivity growth. Economic Research, 5: 95-109.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cheng Z., Qianlong Z., Tongshen Y. (2011). The relationship between environmental pollution and economic growth. Statistical Research, 1: 59-67.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cheng Z., Qianlong Z., Tongshen Y. (2011). The relationship between environmental pollution and economic growth. Statistical Research, 1: 59-67.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chintrakarn P. (2008). Environmental regulation and U.S. states’ technical inefficiency. Economics Letters, 100(3): 363-365.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chintrakarn P. (2008). Environmental regulation and U.S. states’ technical inefficiency. Economics Letters, 100(3): 363-365.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coase R.H. (1960). The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 1-44.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coase R.H. (1960). The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, 3: 1-44.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dean T.J., Brown R.L. (1995). Pollution regulation as a barrier to new firm entry: Initial evidence and implications for future research. The Academy of Management Journal, 1: 288-303.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dean T.J., Brown R.L. (1995). Pollution regulation as a barrier to new firm entry: Initial evidence and implications for future research. The Academy of Management Journal, 1: 288-303.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dechun H., Zhibiao L. (2006). Environmental regulation and enterprise independent innovation: The construction of enterprise competitive advantage based on Porter’s hypothesis. China Industrial Economy, 3: 100-106.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dechun H., Zhibiao L. (2006). Environmental regulation and enterprise independent innovation: The construction of enterprise competitive advantage based on Porter’s hypothesis. China Industrial Economy, 3: 100-106.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dongning Y., Changhui Z. (2005). The driving force for enterprises to voluntarily adopt a standardized environmental management system: Theoretical framework and empirical analysis. Management World, 2: 85-95+107.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dongning Y., Changhui Z. (2005). The driving force for enterprises to voluntarily adopt a standardized environmental management system: Theoretical framework and empirical analysis. Management World, 2: 85-95+107.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Huiling Z., Dan S. (2019). The impact of front-end pollution control on the productivity of Chinese enterprises-a study based on the boundary breakpoint regression method. Economic Review, 1: 75-90.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huiling Z., Dan S. (2019). The impact of front-end pollution control on the productivity of Chinese enterprises-a study based on the boundary breakpoint regression method. Economic Review, 1: 75-90.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hong Z. (2008). The impact of environmental regulation on industrial technological innovation: Empirical analysis based on China’s panel data. Industrial Economics Research, 3: 35-40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hong Z. (2008). The impact of environmental regulation on industrial technological innovation: Empirical analysis based on China’s panel data. Industrial Economics Research, 3: 35-40.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jingshuai L. (2020). Ecological and environmental risk identification and environmental risk management. Science and Technology Innovation Herald, 12: 120-121.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jingshuai L. (2020). Ecological and environmental risk identification and environmental risk management. Science and Technology Innovation Herald, 12: 120-121.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kunming C., Yanda J., Guangnan Z. (2013). The impact of environmental protection policies on the production efficiency of “Made in China”. Statistical Research, 9: 37-43.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kunming C., Yanda J., Guangnan Z. (2013). The impact of environmental protection policies on the production efficiency of “Made in China”. Statistical Research, 9: 37-43.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Man Z. (2005). Research on the correlation mechanism between environmental regulation and enterprise behavior. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 4: 34-39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Man Z. (2005). Research on the correlation mechanism between environmental regulation and enterprise behavior. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 4: 34-39.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mengjie L., Weijian D. (2014). Does the double dividend of environmental regulation and employment apply to China at this stage? Empirical analysis based on inter-provincial panel data. Economic Science, 4: 14-26.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mengjie L., Weijian D. (2014). Does the double dividend of environmental regulation and employment apply to China at this stage? Empirical analysis based on inter-provincial panel data. Economic Science, 4: 14-26.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">National environmental protection standards of the people’s Republic of China (2019). URL: http://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/other/pjjsdz/201810/W020181026519881869834.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">National environmental protection standards of the people’s Republic of China (2019). URL: http://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/other/pjjsdz/201810/W020181026519881869834.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pigou A.C. (1932). The economics of welfare. London, Macmillan.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pigou A.C. (1932). The economics of welfare. London, Macmillan.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Qiang L., Rui N. (2009). Environmental regulation and regional technology innovation: An empirical analysis based on China’s provincial panel data. Journal of China University of Economics and Law, 4: 18-23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Qiang L., Rui N. (2009). Environmental regulation and regional technology innovation: An empirical analysis based on China’s provincial panel data. Journal of China University of Economics and Law, 4: 18-23.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Qunwei W., Dequn Z. (2011). Research on carbon dioxide regulation cost based on environmental production technology - taking panel data of 28 provinces in China as an example 11. Scientific Research Management, 2: 114-121.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Qunwei W., Dequn Z. (2011). Research on carbon dioxide regulation cost based on environmental production technology - taking panel data of 28 provinces in China as an example 11. Scientific Research Management, 2: 114-121.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Solution chalk. Environmental regulation and China’s industrial productivity growth. Industrial Economic Research, 1: 19-25.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Solution chalk. Environmental regulation and China’s industrial productivity growth. Industrial Economic Research, 1: 19-25.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weimin J., Lu Z. (2014). Environmental regulation, opening to the outside world and the progress of green technology in China’s industry. Economic Research, 9: 34-47.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weimin J., Lu Z. (2014). Environmental regulation, opening to the outside world and the progress of green technology in China’s industry. Economic Research, 9: 34-47.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xiangsong Y., Liangyan P. (2011). Research on regulatory efficiency and total factor productivity under China’s environmental regulation: 1999-2008. Finance and Trade Economics, 2: 102-109.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xiangsong Y., Liangyan P. (2011). Research on regulatory efficiency and total factor productivity under China’s environmental regulation: 1999-2008. Finance and Trade Economics, 2: 102-109.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xinjing W., Baohua Z. (2018). Research on the influencing factors of carbon emission efficiency in BRICS countries. Journal of China Academy of Environmental Management, 6: 55-58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xinjing W., Baohua Z. (2018). Research on the influencing factors of carbon emission efficiency in BRICS countries. Journal of China Academy of Environmental Management, 6: 55-58.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xu X., Zhifang Z. (2012). Research on enterprise environmental risk management and environmental liability assessment framework. Auditing and Economic Research, 2: 33-40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xu X., Zhifang Z. (2012). Research on enterprise environmental risk management and environmental liability assessment framework. Auditing and Economic Research, 2: 33-40.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xuejie B., Ying S. (2009). Environmental control, technological innovation and the efficiency improvement of China’s thermal power industry. China Industrial Economics, 8: 68-77.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xuejie B., Ying S. (2009). Environmental control, technological innovation and the efficiency improvement of China’s thermal power industry. China Industrial Economics, 8: 68-77.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yanxia Y. (2020). Construction of risk environment assessment index system. China New Technology and New Products, 11: 105-107.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yanxia Y. (2020). Construction of risk environment assessment index system. China New Technology and New Products, 11: 105-107.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yuanyuan C. (2011). The impact of industry environmental regulation on employment Empirical research: Empirical analysis based on 25 industrial industries. Contemporary Economic Science, 3: 67-73.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yuanyuan C. (2011). The impact of industry environmental regulation on employment Empirical research: Empirical analysis based on 25 industrial industries. Contemporary Economic Science, 3: 67-73.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yunan L., Ting L. (2012). The dynamic relationship between environmental regulations, factor endowments and export trade: Based on dynamic panel data of my country’s pollution-intensive industries. International Economics and Trade Research, 1: 34-42.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yunan L., Ting L. (2012). The dynamic relationship between environmental regulations, factor endowments and export trade: Based on dynamic panel data of my country’s pollution-intensive industries. International Economics and Trade Research, 1: 34-42.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
